Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Retired Forums ⇒ Short Subjects (No new topics or messages) ⇒

Size of singularity

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev123
Author Topic:   Size of singularity
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

crashfrog Posts Only
Message 31 of 34 (113821)
06-09-2004 8:29 AM 		Reply to: Message 30 by Jason
06-09-2004 8:25 AM

All your base are belong to us
How are you doing gentlemen!
​
You have no chance to survive make your time.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Jason, posted 06-09-2004 8:25 AM Jason has not replied
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.3

Dr Jack Posts Only
Message 32 of 34 (113822)
06-09-2004 8:29 AM 		Reply to: Message 27 by Jerry
06-09-2004 8:12 AM

And back to where the sigularity was located. To answer my own question, it was not located "here" as Crashfrog put it, it wasn't located anywhere, because acording to science nothing existed before the big bang. There was no space for it to be located in so it created it's own space from nothing so it could created itself. And beyond the space that this universe occupies now there is more of this undescribable nothing. If this is rational I think somehow I made a wrong turn somewhere and ended up on the wrong planet. But I keep forgetting that Earth scientist say this is the way it is so it must be true no matter how illogical it sounds.
​
This is just wrong. Science doesn't say the big bang was created out of nothing, it doesn't say it created itself, it doesn't say there was nothing before it. It says, with some certainty, we don't know - these questions are ones to which we have no answer - we don't even really know that it became a singularity (both string theory and QLG would disagree). What we do know is that there was a big bang, and that it tracks back to a size of 10-23m - we know this because observations of the CBM prove it, not because some scientist says so.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Jerry, posted 06-09-2004 8:12 AM Jerry has not replied
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1524 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004

1.61803 Posts Only
Message 33 of 34 (113906)
06-09-2004 1:12 PM 		Reply to: Message 27 by Jerry
06-09-2004 8:12 AM

Jerry writes:
​
is energy totally devoid of mass?
E=MC2
Jerry writes:
​
why is energy energy?
Why not?
Jerry writes:
​
Is it caused by interaction of more than 1 substance?
Please define substance. Energy simply exist, I do not know if "caused" is applicable. Energy is the currency of the Cosmos. IMO.
​
"One is punished most for ones virtues" Fredrick Neitzche
This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Jerry, posted 06-09-2004 8:12 AM Jerry has not replied
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002

Adminnemooseus Posts Only
Message 34 of 34 (113931)
06-09-2004 3:11 PM

Thread copied to the Size of singularity thread in the Big Bang and Cosmology forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev123
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024