A modern object described in ancient texts negates Creation Myth

quote:

---

The time travel premise I'll grant you, because I'm no physicist.

---

What hypocrisy !Just because you aint a physicist you won't laugh this nonsense off the board. You are so openminded........you and Crick's space aliens.Anything and everything will be considered except God.This is blatant evidence of the "God sense removal" declared in Romans 1

Hey Eddie:Your reliance on Strong's Dictionary is a solid sign of an amateur. While Strong's is popular without a doubt - it is a source for beginners. No serious scholar/theologian would rely on Strong's as their primary source for Biblical word meanings.

quote:

---

What nonsense.

---

This reaction of yours also demonstrates the truth of Romans 1.It is "nonsense" because "God sense" has been removed.All because you will protect the nonsense of space aliens and time travel and the reputable people who support this nonsense. God is way more plausible and the refusal to even credit Him deistically demonstrates the truth of Romans 1.

http://EvC Forum: PROOF OF GOD -->EvC Forum: PROOF OF GOD

Absolute fundie/scientism dogma dismissal.You refuse to look at the evidence only because it threatens something you already spoke up for.Nothing was refuted, a few pseudo-intellectuals who know nothing about the Pyramid inundated the topic with kindergarten input.You are scared and saying things scared people say.

Please come over to the topic in question and POST your refuting evidence. The evidence I posted was clearly explained and sources cited. This is how debate is conducted. The evidence of the Pyramid remains and it cannot be refuted.Tell me Jar, describe "technology" as it existed 2000 years ago ?Then do the same with 3000 and 4000 years ago. Just a brief outline - what do you say ?Please take your response to the appropriate topic as we are way off topic here.

So are you refusing to refute or are you going to just say it as if it is even though it is not ?Where is your technology outline ?I will settle for ONE scrap of evidence that indicates Egyptians built the Pyramid. Surely you don't think they built the Suez canal ?

As per my original accusation that began this exchange - your mind is closed, which isn't a problem. The problem is the open-minded facade that wraps your closed mind.Space aliens/time travel yet a physical structure on the face of the Earth that could not be built today and you won't even appease my criticism by saying "I'll look at the evidence on my own schedule", but the aforementioned nonsense of space aliens and time travel instantly gets a "jury is still out" acceptance.

Jar:The content of this post reveals you haven't spent 10 hours of your life reviewing the claims of the Pyramid. Science demands physical evidence that it can examine yet the Pyramid is treated like a spectre.Every person who recognizes the Pyramid for what it is initially laughed at the claims. These same people ended up writing the irrefutable research in favor of the claims.Lets toss any and all Biblical claims and just focus on the scientific wonders contained in the Pyramid. There are endless secular websites that present this evidence. The intelligence and technology that built the Pyramid could not of been built by any human being that existed thousands of years ago. 70 ton blocks cut with optical precision and erected into position 40 stories high defies ancient "neanderthal" intelligence and know-how. Ancient humans/Egyptians barely mastered chariot and seige machine "technology", much less genius scientific technology that came in to discovery since the Renaissance (to be generous).I posted the Pyramid topic in full knowledge that it would be instantly dismissed by persons who never studied the evidence for 10 hours of their life. My true point was to demonstrate that this present scientific generation is not as open minded as they claim. The physical structure that sits exactly in the center of Egypt and on the border thereof proves it.You can have the last word if you want unless you take up the debate in the "Proof of God" topic.WT.

Hi Custard !My point was for all intents and purposes nobody (my opponents) has spent 10 hours of their life reviewing the evidence and sources pertaining to the claims that God built the Pyramid.Watching 35 hours of commercial television, a source that will not even remotely touch the scientific evidence much less the Divine evidence, obviously does not count. Commercial television will only parrot the drivel of egyptologists and their nonsense that humans beings thousands of years ago built this genius structure with incline planes, levers, pulleys, and slave labor. Any objective person who LOOKS at the scientific evidence alone will quickly abandon the aforementioned rubbish.

Arach:About what year did mankind forsake the belief that the Earth was flat ?