How do we go from that one celled organism into all living things.
By random mutation and natural selection; proven, observed processes with the creative power to give rise to phenomenal species change.
So for evolution to work it needs to add new information into the genes. But in all observations of natural selection, adaptation are all downhill processes.
Only if you define "downhill" as "any change from what was before." In that case, of course, it's a contradiction in terms to ask for an "uphill change", because you've already defined "change" as "downhill."
Pretty clever, Almeyda, but not clever enough. There's more than enough examples of mutations that confer positive, advantageous traits. I just gave you one before - human Hemoglobin C.
It would help evolutionists or better yet be necessary to point to examples of this.
I did already.
Dr Dawkins a man whos books has sold millions and who is never lost for words was stoped like a deer in the headlights in the video 'From Frog to a Prince' when asked if he could give one example of a mutation or any evolutionary procces which has added information to the genome.
Actually, in that session, he gives several examples of information-increasing mutations. Why didn't you see or hear any of them? The creationists who made the video edited them out.
Here's a little more about that video fraud:
CB102.1: Dawkins interviewed about evolution increasing information
Doesn't it ever anger you, Almeyda, how creationists lie to you? I know it angered me when I found out. I used to be a creationist too, you know.