"Slanted" Eyes in Orientals

Let's pretend we have two organisms in front of us that can't interbreed.How do we tell if they're from the same kind and have lost the ability to interbreed (which creationists tell us happens sometimes) or if they're from two different kinds and have never been able to interbreed?

Mutations do that, though. They're new gene alleles. Like that new Hemoglobin C gene that confers resistance to malaria without the same anemic consequences of Hemoglobin S. What are you talking about? Random mutation and natural selection provide that capability. Random mutation is the source of random strings and natural selection filters out all but the ones with additional "information", whatever that is.You're saying that "evolution has no process to generate new information", but evolution - or the mechanisms of evolution, anyway - are that process.

By random mutation and natural selection; proven, observed processes with the creative power to give rise to phenomenal species change. Only if you define "downhill" as "any change from what was before." In that case, of course, it's a contradiction in terms to ask for an "uphill change", because you've already defined "change" as "downhill."Pretty clever, Almeyda, but not clever enough. There's more than enough examples of mutations that confer positive, advantageous traits. I just gave you one before - human Hemoglobin C. I did already. Actually, in that session, he gives several examples of information-increasing mutations. Why didn't you see or hear any of them? The creationists who made the video edited them out.Here's a little more about that video fraud: CB102.1: Dawkins interviewed about evolution increasing informationDoesn't it ever anger you, Almeyda, how creationists lie to you? I know it angered me when I found out. I used to be a creationist too, you know.

Almeyda, if you're not even going to read my posts, don't bother replying, ok? You seriously didn't ask a single question that my previous post didn't address.If you want to know more about human Hemoglobin C, why don't you search on http://www.pubmed.org? It's an open database of biological literature.