"I actually understand your reasonning, but then doesn't your theory leave room for God?"
--If it suits your subjective speculation (which could possibly be your opinion on objective observation), so be it. That is great, just watch the tenability of what you include in your scientific conclusions.
"because if "we are evolving into something other than what we are currently" then isn't it feasible to have a being a Creator that is more "evolved" and far more intelligent than those of us who are on earth?"
--I think you are trying to mix oil with water here. The first segment of your sentence seemingly indicates a process of biologic developmental Evolution. The second which you seem to want to branch off from a phylogenetic perspective in biology doesn't hold the same evolutionary concept. Unless you would like to make a proffer on your theory of evolutionary decent with modification from an initial point of diverging the supernatural and natural populations. Well, I'd like to hear that one.
--On a more subjective but viable note, I hold the belief along with many others in this forum that God, being God, would happen to be a bit more intelligent than any earthly organism. I think that is rational.
"See it is not so far fetched after all."
--I don't think anyone here is arguing a case against the existence of God, let alone which God.
"I don't understand why no one would believe me if I said that my computer came from a matter that randomly and over time created itself and evolved from a tic tac, something that is also inanimate, yet people of such great and wonderfully God given intelligence truly want to believe that any living matter even a microbe came from a non-living non source of nothing to form our beautiful land, seas, skies let alone an actual functioning breathing without thinking human being."
--Again, no one is arguing against the existence of God, and there are some point of views which may even say that God guided the evolutionary process.
"The Bible is full of Science
[1] and I know that it can be proven that their is a heavenly Father by using the scientific method.
[2]"
--[1] - The bible really isn't full of 'science'
per se, but to argue that the bible is full of applied science in documented observation may be argued for.
--[2] - This cannot be 'proven', this word is readily underestimated and misused frequently, but it is important to be corrective of your word usage and assertions. Also, by using the scientific method you are automatically confined to the realm of the observable, analogous to the natural. Knowing this, I think that it would be difficult to prove or to show as a fact, supernatural characteristics.
"I am a Biology major by brain and a Christian by heart. They can go hand in hand , not opposing beliefs but one and the same."
--Something like that, yes. :\
--Its great to get back to the board, I feel refreshed from all that previous brain work.
------------------
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 06-30-2002]