Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,771 Year: 4,028/9,624 Month: 899/974 Week: 226/286 Day: 33/109 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems with the first life
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 7 of 138 (124466)
07-14-2004 12:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by tubi417
07-14-2004 3:03 AM


tubi417 writes:
Alright lets pretend that somehow a cell was formed in a primative ocean.
Let me outline our current generally accepted abiogenesis model.
quote:
Stage 1
Abiotic synthesis of organic monomers.
We know for a fact that organic molecules form natrually rather easily under certain condition. This was demonstrated by the Miller experiment in the early 50's. He basically created an enclosed apparatus and he put inside water, hydrogen gas, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and a whole bunch of other non-organic molecules that thought to have existed in early earth environment. He then zapped the apparatus with electricity for about 3-4 days. He then took the apparatus apart and found amino acids, monomers of proteins, ATP, and a whole bunch of other organic molecules.
Repeats of the orginal experiment by other scientists have produced all 20 amino acids necessary for life, lipids, sugars, nucleotides of monomers of DNA and RNA, and ATP.
Stage 2 Abiotic Synthesis of polymers
The miller experiment have shown that organic monomers can form quite easily naturally without any divine intervention. This stage explains how these monomers could come together and form polymers such as proteins and nucleic acids without help from biological components today like enzymes.
Scientists have been able to create such polymerization without any divine intervention by dripping solutions of organic monomers onto hot sand, rock, and clay. The heat vaporizes the water in the solutions and the monomres naturally establish bonds that form polymers such as chains of amino acids that make up proteins.
The hypothesis goes that water may have splashed the monomers onto hot rocks of early earth and natural processes pretty much took care of the rest.
Stage 3 Self replicating molecules
The hypothesis suggests that the first replicating organic material were short strands of RNA. Laboratory experiments have shown that nucleotide monomers can naturally assemble into RNA molecules without divine intervention. This process happens without the presence of cells or enzymes. As you can imagine, the result is a pool of RNA strands. Now, what scientists have also observed is that some of these RNA strands actually self replicate without any help from anything whatsoever.
Stage 4 Assembly of pre-cells
Again, laboratory experiments have shown that lipids can fold and establish a self-contained environment in the center from the environment.
For those of you that doesn't know what a cell structure look like, here is a brief explantion. A prokaryotic cell contains a cell wall that isolate the inside from the outside environment.
A pre-cell is pretty much very similar to this structural design. Lipids could have curved in itself and isolate a small pocket of envirnment in the center. When scientists put the pre-cells (which assembled without any help from anybody) into different solutions of salt concentrations, they found that pre-cells store energy in a form of voltage in their membrane (the cell wall equivalent). When introduced certain enzymes to the pre-cells, the precells displayed a very primitive metabolism. They absorbed substratesfrom their surroundings and release the products of the reactions.
Lets say that this cell somehow because of "chemicals" has all the necessary organelles(and the chances of this happening are.......).
What the heck are you talking about? Many many many things today don't have any organelle at all. Why demand that the first life must have all organelles?
The first life you think would be pretty fragile, yet because there had to have been no oxygen in the atmosphere there obviously would NOT be an ozone layer.
According to our currently accepted model, the first life started in the ocean. Plenty of protection there.
Without an ozone layer this cell would receive heavy doses radiation from the sun- obviously this would kill it.
There is also another possibility. We think that the first life on earth were actually the archaea domain. They are extreme bacteria living in extreme areas, like hyperthermal vents deep in the ocean that sometimes get hotter than a hundred degrees, volcanically active regions, deep below the earth's surface where there's no sunlight and the bacteria are dependent on non-organic minerals only, and the polar ice caps.
Who knows? For all we know, there once could have existed a form of life that could withstand that much solar radiation.
Lets say that it magically survives and somehow this cell mutated so that it magically mastered many essential life process-for example-
Again, you are making an unfounded assertion. In order for something to be alive, it has to have the essential processes that life possess, such as a metabolism. Otherwise, it's not alive.
Protein Synthesis- It had to have a mutation that would create mRNA and somehow a mutation to get it to the right place and somehow another mutation for the tRNA to develope and so on. If one of these "mutations" that created the process of protein synthesis was wrong- lets say the tRNA was brought to the vacuole- the cell DOES NOT survive.
You are describing a eukaryotic cell. The first life on earth were prokariotes.
Somehow this cell also had a mutation that caused it to be able to reproduce asexually- if it didn't have this mutation- we wouldn't be here right now.
If it can't produce, it's not alive. Therefore, it was a given in the first place.
In some experiments, precells have been known to divide through fusion. There is no reason to believe that the first cells couldn't reproduce the same way.
Lets say that chemicals in this primitive ocean make millions and millions of cells complete with all organelles- NOT from asexual reproduction but because of some kinda chemical reaction.
What the fuck are you talking? This assertion doesn't even begin to make any sense.
How likely is it that one of these cells is going to have a mutation for the process of protein synthesis? A mutation that would create anything beneficial to the cell? If any of these cells had a mutation they would probably die.
If you go back and start making sense of yourself, we can go on to this point. Before then, I don't think any explanation we have can help. If you want to have a steak for dinner, you must first realize that you have to go out to the supermarket to get some meat. Can't make a steak by just assuming that it will already be on the table waiting for you to devour it. Get my drift?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by tubi417, posted 07-14-2004 3:03 AM tubi417 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by gbunty, posted 07-24-2004 2:21 PM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 96 by JRTjr, posted 08-16-2004 3:16 PM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 8 of 138 (124467)
07-14-2004 12:38 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by jar
07-14-2004 12:21 PM


jar writes:
Actually, the density of water is 1 because we said it is.
I think he was refering to how the specific density of liquid water allow solid water to float, thus protecting life in cold regions.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 07-14-2004 12:21 PM jar has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 10 of 138 (124484)
07-14-2004 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by fnord
07-14-2004 1:43 PM


Hahahahahaha
He actually said that? That's the funniest thing I've seen this week.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by fnord, posted 07-14-2004 1:43 PM fnord has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by fnord, posted 07-14-2004 7:25 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 13 of 138 (124530)
07-14-2004 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by jar
07-14-2004 1:56 PM


Actually, I just thought of a good argument for the creationist... Good God! I just found a tick on my leg! Just came back from the forest. Need to shower immediately.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by jar, posted 07-14-2004 1:56 PM jar has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 17 of 138 (124660)
07-15-2004 3:40 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by pink sasquatch
07-15-2004 3:31 AM


ps writes:
Dosing of the first cell or pre-cells with radiation would have increased mutation/breakage/rearrangement rate in the nucleic acids of those cells, thus potentially accelerating evolution.
Thanks Somehow, I have completely missed this possibility.
Edited to change the last word in the previous sentence from point to possibility.
This message has been edited by Lam, 07-15-2004 02:41 AM

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by pink sasquatch, posted 07-15-2004 3:31 AM pink sasquatch has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by pink sasquatch, posted 08-18-2004 2:44 PM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 34 of 138 (125819)
07-19-2004 11:42 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by dandon83
07-19-2004 6:16 AM


Re: your topic is logical
dandon83 writes:
If we accept that life had been exist due to some chemical reactoins ;we -surely-will face the truth that the earth age is too short to be enough .Such reactions (that can creat a such various complicated organisms)will take many many multiples of earth time (if it could be realy).
I see that you are new, so I am going to go easy on you, for now.
Would you mind telling us how you got such an idea? Some probability math work would be just fine.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by dandon83, posted 07-19-2004 6:16 AM dandon83 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by dandon83, posted 07-20-2004 5:53 AM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 72 of 138 (126290)
07-21-2004 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by dandon83
07-20-2004 5:53 AM


Re: your topic is logical
dandon83 writes:
Thank you LAM but I prefer that you would be just scientific . and thank you for your kindness.
Ok, then explain how you arrived at your conclusion.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by dandon83, posted 07-20-2004 5:53 AM dandon83 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by dandon83, posted 07-22-2004 5:27 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 82 of 138 (127433)
07-25-2004 5:56 AM
Reply to: Message 79 by gbunty
07-24-2004 2:21 PM


Re: Any good links?
Sorry gbunty, but I'm afraid you're going to have to do the research yourself. I'm an old fashion college science student who doesn't do much research online. I don't trust most of the sources online, so I tend to go for books. I'll dig out some stuff on the subject later .

The Laminator
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by gbunty, posted 07-24-2004 2:21 PM gbunty has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 97 of 138 (134407)
08-16-2004 3:56 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by JRTjr
08-16-2004 3:16 PM


Re: I’m no scientist so let me try to put this in laymen’s terms
jrtjr1 writes:
and, by the way, where did you get it}
I'm not an internet person. I got my info through the old fashioned way, sitting in college classes and take down notes.
Under the right conditions we can see that some of the same metals mix together in, somewhat, the same way as they are found in the material found in this laptop.
If we throw down a bunch of two-inch sticks, we can see that some letters form with out intervention...
You are using a false analogy fallacy.
Nowhere in the theory of abiogenesis did it say that under the right condition will a T-rex come to be from the primordial soup. That's what your analogy implied, that windows can come into being from scraps of metal.
The theory of abiogenesis and the theory of evolution (2 completely different disciplines in biology) only apply to organic matter and living things... and possibly to other things like memes.
You say, Ah, but wait, there is a difference between your laptop and a living cell
Your right, but before that cell was alive it was just a collection of amino acids, monomers of proteins, ATP, and a whole bunch of other organic molecules
Your point is?
So, if we are to believe, have faith in, evolution we must be willing to believe that all thing that show both organization, and complexity could come into existence with out intelligent design. After all the most organized, and complex thing in this universe, a single cell, did.
Um... no. A prokaryotic cell (which is believed to be the first living thing in the world) is not complex at all. I recommend a simple biology course at your local college.
Sorry, That take more blind faith then I have.
Um... you claimed before that you liked science, yet you don't really know how science works.
If, it is logical for me to look at a simple Laptop computer and say, Hay, Someone must have put a lot of thought into designing this then, would it not be just as logical to look at, the much more complex, cell and say, Gee, Someone must have put a lot of thought into designing this
False analogy, again.
What you just demonstrated was not logic. You used common sense, which can't be trusted in some things.
If you truly like science, you should have known to leave a blank spot in your book of knowledge if you don't know how something came to be rather than automatically have faith in an intelligent designer.
By the way, it seems that you have a grossly oversimplified understanding of how science works.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by JRTjr, posted 08-16-2004 3:16 PM JRTjr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by JRTjr, posted 08-22-2004 12:52 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 100 of 138 (134449)
08-16-2004 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Percy
08-16-2004 4:46 PM


Re: I’m no scientist so let me try to put this in laymen’s terms
Percy writes:
I haven't read Lam's reply yet and so don't know what he's arguing, but I would urge you to be skepical of any claims that we have any satisfactory answers to the puzzle of the origin of life.
That's why I tried to make it clear that the model I presented is only one of many models and that this is the one that is most generally accepted for now.
The simple truth is the theory of abiogenesis is still in its sketchy infancy compared to the theory of evolution.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Percy, posted 08-16-2004 4:46 PM Percy has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 503 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 102 of 138 (135005)
08-18-2004 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by pink sasquatch
08-18-2004 2:44 PM


Re: radiation as early selection
That's cool.

The Laminator
We are the bog. Resistance is voltage over current.
For goodness's sake, please vote Democrat this November!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by pink sasquatch, posted 08-18-2004 2:44 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024