Is this the old "What good is a half a wing" gambit?
I like it when this or the half an eye story comes up. IMHO it's one of the best points for evolution and the final nail in the Intelligent Design coffin. And one of the few points that could actually be tested.
The problem with the half a wing argument is that it assumes that the only purpose of the wing was flight. But what if it started out serving some other function?
I came across this Stephen J Gould article some time ago and it shows an experiment on just this subject.
The idea is that what later became wings may have originally been something else. And when we look around at life, that's pretty much what we see. We don't see the well designed critter that either the Creationist or Intelligent Design folk would like. What we do see is systems that are cobbled together, stuff made to do odd jobs, patches and duct tape.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion