There's already enough evidence to safely conclude dishonesty on the part of Jar and Mammuthus in this thread. The evolutionist tells some lies about the relationship between darwinism and social darwinism, and then the evolutionist argues that social darwnism doesn't affect the scientific validity of evolution theory, as if that answers the question of the influence of darwinism on intellectual climate of opinion. That's how these arguments always go.
When you have your priviledges restored you can back up your claims of lies, suppy more than assertions for you position and play nice.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 08-22-2004 01:51 PM