they would see that BOTH evolutionists and creationists have well backed scientific arguements which, in their purity, are not illogical assumptions
It isn't appropriate in this thread -- the topic is "Darwin's Greatest Mistake" -- but I would like you to propse a thread on the creationists well-backed scientific arguements. Haven't seen them yet.
Both sides of this arguement require a degree of faith. It is impossible to beleive in either theory without this.
This is yet another interesting topic to propose. I'd love to see the list of things that must be taken of faith by the biologists.
If this:
but also must require a certain amount of faith within their belefief evolution (chance) has created something out of nothing.
is an example you have it very wrong. That is not a belief of biolgists involved with the evolution. Biological evolution is not a theory about chance creating something out of nothing. All that tells me is that you are discussing something without knowing enough about it.
Separately from that, the mechanisms of biological evolution have been shown, conclusively,
to be capable of "creating" the kinds of patterns necessary for and shown to be in biologically evolved things. Again, you can't discuss things you know little about.
BTW, welcome to the forum. You'll find people reasonably hospitable (or else) as long as you are but you will not find people overly gentle if you haven't thought things through and can't back up what you say.