Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the scientific end of evolution theory
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5680 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 10 of 20 (13189)
07-09-2002 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by peter borger
07-08-2002 7:16 AM


Peter B.
You should contact these guys and explain to them why evolution is useless and explain to the journals that evolution is falsified:
Scientists at The Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) have completed the genomic sequence of a green-sulfur bacterium, Chlorobium tepidum, which provides important insights into the evolution and the mechanism of photosynthesis.
and:
Researchers at MIT and Rice University have discovered that microRNAs, an emerging class of non-protein gene regulators thus far only identified in animals, also exist in plants. By extending the known phylogenetic range of miRNAs to plants, this work points to an ancient evolutionary origin for microRNAs. The report is published in the July 1 issue of the scientific journal Genes & Development.
and:
A Saint Louis University geologist has unearthed further evidence in his mounting case that shifting of the continents -- and perhaps life on Earth -- began much earlier than many scientists believe. Tim Kusky has discovered the first large intact pieces of oceanic mantle from the planet's earliest period. The nearly mile-long section of rock, which is billions of years old, may hold clues as to when life developed.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by peter borger, posted 07-08-2002 7:16 AM peter borger has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by peter borger, posted 07-09-2002 11:03 PM Joe Meert has replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5680 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 14 of 20 (13220)
07-09-2002 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by peter borger
07-09-2002 11:03 PM


quote:
Originally posted by peter borger:
Dear Professor,
Apparently you did not read these papers, but only skimmed the summary. If you had even started reading the paper by Eisen et al (about Chlorobium) you would have noted immediately in the introduction the sentence: "The Chlorobia have unique mechanisms of photosynthesis relative to other phototrophs". What do you think the word unique stands for in evolution theory?
Please do not copy the opinion of others but be objective and read the articles you refer to".
I invite you to be specific in your references and keep it scientifically (i.e. referencees included).
Best wishes,
Peter

Well, I went and read two of the three articles and did not see anything remotely supporting your 'deadly' analysis of evolution. Have you anything substantive to support your assertion?
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by peter borger, posted 07-09-2002 11:03 PM peter borger has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by peter borger, posted 07-10-2002 2:27 AM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024