Investigation of Biblical science errors

---

BREATHE DEEP THE GATHERING GLOOM

---

BREATHE DEEP THE GATHERING GLOOM

Thanks for the support. Sorry for the extreme delay in responding. Suspensions will do that to you. If you are still interested, I too am game.

---

Let me see if I understand what you are saying here. This guy was an evolutionist, at some point he committed his life to christ but did not become a biblical creationist until more than a year had passed after his conversion into christianity. So for at least a year, he most likely studied the bible before he was finally convinced of the creationist viewpoint. I would have though he would have become a creationist immediately following his conversion but apparently this was not the case. Apparently, and this is only speculation on my part, he studied, learned, and then believed.Are you suggesting that evolutionists first believe in the theory of evolution, and then study and learn what it teaches?That is not how it worked with me. I studied and learned, eventually believing what the evidence truly showed, that microevolution has, is, and will continue to happen. That macroevolution is a myth, rooted in ancient beliefs, has been modernized to fit todays secularized methodology, and is taught as fact despite the overwhelming evidence against it.How about you? Did you believe in evolution before studying or did you study before believing? Did you study the evidence before becoming a believer or did you simply adopt the teachings, accepting them as true because you already held to a belief in evolution?

---

So glad to hear from you again. It is late, I have replied to numerous posts already and rather than attempt to begin our discussion at this late hour, I will wait until I am refreshed so as to seem a bit more coherent to you. My way of thinking is most definitely not what one would consider mainstream, neither from the evolutionist nor the creationist point of view.As I am sure you have already noticed, it can be difficult to actually have a one on one discussion in this forum, as the neo-evo's love to perform their feeding frenzy for all to see. One post from anyone not totally in line with their way of thinking will garner a dozen replies, none of which have very much to say and are usually just endless repetitions of the same neo-evo dogma that they have been brainwashed into believing for the better part of their lives. For many of them, science is their god, the myth of macroevolution is their bible, and Darwin is their god.Nevertheless, I have found that when a post is directed to a specific individual, it is not against any forum guideline to ignore pesty trolls who will undoubtedly inundate you with meaningless, repetitious responses. As long as you direct your posts to me and I direct mine to you, I see no problem in maintaining a one on one dialog. The neo-evo trolls, those perpetuators of the myth of macroevolution, will not like it but as far as I am concerned, either they can practice their feeding frenzy elsewhere or we can move our discussion into the free for all arena and ignore them to our hearts content.

---