Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,433 Year: 3,690/9,624 Month: 561/974 Week: 174/276 Day: 14/34 Hour: 0/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Solving the Mystery of the Biblical Flood
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 271 of 460 (8986)
04-26-2002 12:06 AM
Reply to: Message 268 by wmscott
04-25-2002 6:04 PM


wmscott, I wish you good luck at getting published. But, might a "semi-popular" "journal" such as Discover maybe be a better target? I would think that Discover would be, to some degree, peer reviewed.
By the way, as of 4/10/02, you have received a rather harsh review at:
Amazon.com /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F0%5F1/102-1780506-1693707
I believe I have not previously posted to this topic. I have not been following it very closely. Maybe I'll now get back to reading the entire thing, and maybe it's "Talk Origins" counterparts.
Regards,
Moose
------------------
BS degree, geology, '83
Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Old Earth evolution - Yes
Godly creation - Maybe
[This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 04-25-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by wmscott, posted 04-25-2002 6:04 PM wmscott has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by wmscott, posted 05-03-2002 5:22 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 273 of 460 (9008)
04-26-2002 3:58 PM
Reply to: Message 272 by Percy
04-26-2002 3:16 PM


quote:
Percy, directed to wmscott: I think Discover magazine would be an ironic choice for submission of an article by you, since they just ran an article about people suffering similar delusions in the April, 2002, issue ( Discover Financial Services ).
I didn't dig into the pile of various mags, to re-read that article, but I seem to recall that there was an example of one of the "delutionals" turning out to have a valid concept, a work of genius.
Moose
------------------
BS degree, geology, '83
Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Old Earth evolution - Yes
Godly creation - Maybe
[This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 04-26-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by Percy, posted 04-26-2002 3:16 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by Mister Pamboli, posted 04-26-2002 4:10 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 350 of 460 (14076)
07-24-2002 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 349 by John
07-24-2002 7:51 PM


quote:
The ice in Antartica isn't the issue if, as you say it has not changed. (I didn't look it up, but it isn't relevant to my argument anyway) The massive glaciers that formed in the northern hemishere would jerk water out of the ocean causing a low, then during the interstitials as they melted, put water back, causing a sea-level high. These changes are slow enough that coral could form just fine. Now, as the glaciers have once again receeded we have a low ocean and see dead coral above sea level. You seem to go on and explain this effect yourself.
(my bolds)
I'm really not into the debate on this specific topic, but I thought it would be good for someone on the evolution side to point out the above quirk in your statement.
Wouldn't the glacial recession result in a high sea level?
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 349 by John, posted 07-24-2002 7:51 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 351 by John, posted 07-24-2002 8:34 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024