Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,411 Year: 3,668/9,624 Month: 539/974 Week: 152/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   new species claimed to be discovered
frank
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 4 (14239)
07-26-2002 5:35 PM


As reported in the New York Times :
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/24/science/24BUGS.html
Had this discovery been made in some backwater of the Amazon it probably wouldn't have made me wonder too much, but it was discovered in New York City's Central Park. Is it fairly new or had it been there a very long time and never been noticed? I tend to think the former is true. If it evolved, from what did it evolve? If it were recently placed by a Creator in its present form, that would trouble me some.
Anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this ?
Clear Skies !
Frank

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by nator, posted 07-28-2002 6:35 PM frank has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 2 of 4 (14322)
07-28-2002 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by frank
07-26-2002 5:35 PM


quote:
Originally posted by frank:
As reported in the New York Times :
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/24/science/24BUGS.html
Had this discovery been made in some backwater of the Amazon it probably wouldn't have made me wonder too much, but it was discovered in New York City's Central Park. Is it fairly new or had it been there a very long time and never been noticed? I tend to think the former is true. If it evolved, from what did it evolve? If it were recently placed by a Creator in its present form, that would trouble me some.
Anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this ?
Clear Skies !
Frank

First of all, it's not like a great deal of searching for new species happens in Central Park, because much of the biodiversity is gone.
Second, there are lots of species, especially of things bug-size and smaller, that haven't been discovered yet. There are probably hundreds or thousands of species that have become extinct without us ever knowing about their existence.
I would think that it evolved from other species of centipede, which evolved from a centipede-like ancestor, which evolved from the ancestor of all arthropods, etc. etc. etc...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by frank, posted 07-26-2002 5:35 PM frank has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by John, posted 07-28-2002 6:43 PM nator has not replied
 Message 4 by John, posted 07-28-2002 6:45 PM nator has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 4 (14324)
07-28-2002 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by nator
07-28-2002 6:35 PM


quote:
Originally posted by schrafinator:
quote:
Originally posted by frank:
As reported in the New York Times :
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/24/science/24BUGS.html
Had this discovery been made in some backwater of the Amazon it probably wouldn't have made me wonder too much, but it was discovered in New York City's Central Park. Is it fairly new or had it been there a very long time and never been noticed? I tend to think the former is true. If it evolved, from what did it evolve? If it were recently placed by a Creator in its present form, that would trouble me some.
Anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this ?
Clear Skies !
Frank

First of all, it's not like a great deal of searching for new species happens in Central Park, because much of the biodiversity is gone.
Second, there are lots of species, especially of things bug-size and smaller, that haven't been discovered yet. There are probably hundreds or thousands of species that have become extinct without us ever knowing about their existence.
I would think that it evolved from other species of centipede, which evolved from a centipede-like ancestor, which evolved from the ancestor of all arthropods, etc. etc. etc...

Yeah, from the article it looks probable that this bug's ascestors were imported. I think there was a mention of similarity to asian species.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by nator, posted 07-28-2002 6:35 PM nator has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 4 (14325)
07-28-2002 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by nator
07-28-2002 6:35 PM


quote:
Originally posted by schrafinator:
quote:
Originally posted by frank:
As reported in the New York Times :
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/24/science/24BUGS.html
Had this discovery been made in some backwater of the Amazon it probably wouldn't have made me wonder too much, but it was discovered in New York City's Central Park. Is it fairly new or had it been there a very long time and never been noticed? I tend to think the former is true. If it evolved, from what did it evolve? If it were recently placed by a Creator in its present form, that would trouble me some.
Anyone have any thoughts or opinions on this ?
Clear Skies !
Frank

First of all, it's not like a great deal of searching for new species happens in Central Park, because much of the biodiversity is gone.
Second, there are lots of species, especially of things bug-size and smaller, that haven't been discovered yet. There are probably hundreds or thousands of species that have become extinct without us ever knowing about their existence.
I would think that it evolved from other species of centipede, which evolved from a centipede-like ancestor, which evolved from the ancestor of all arthropods, etc. etc. etc...

Yeah, from the article it looks probable that this bug's ascestors were imported. I think there was a mention of similarity to asian species.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by nator, posted 07-28-2002 6:35 PM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024