WK writes:
Saying that there is no 1 single 'complete' fossil lineage doesn't mean that there is no physical evidence of evolution and certainly doesn't mean that scientists are lying. At the worst all it means is that we don't have fossils showing every transitional stage in any 1 evolutionary lineage, so what? Such a fossil lineage still wouldn't be 'proof' to those who object to evolution on religious grounds.
Mangy Tiger is an evolutionist arguing that the British Royal Crown MUST not contain a single break in the lineage OR the claim is refuted.
Now in this thread you evos assert the opposite.
For the record I side with Wounded King.
Absence in the record or a complete record does not necessarily mean thus and such.
The only issue is macro evolution - one species evolving into another.