Evolutionists tell us that metazoans evolved from some non-metazoan population. They can't substantiate that claim with evidence. They also make other claim s that cannot and have not been substantuated
This criticism, even if true, is not the same thing as what PaulK was talking about. SC is defined by a mathematical approach. IC is claimed to be a form of SC. Where is the mathematical application which connects the two?
This is so simple an issue I am unsure why you are attempting to duck it in this fashion.
As far as the above is concerned, the nature of positive evidence has been brought to your attention by me and you left it unaddressed.
You can pretend you haven't seen the above argument shot down, but that does not make it so.
Then when told that evidence for a designer is in the design, ie the structures we see under the microscope, they say that isn't enough.
Of course simply saying "it's in the design" isn't enough. You must come up with criteria to detect design. That is after all what ID theorists are claiming to have done.
By the way one of the structures you have noted... blood clotting cascades... have already been disproven as necessarily IC. I believe even Behe has admitted that that example is no longer correct. You might want to chuck it in your list of proofs.
that species can diversify does not explain how that species came about in the first place.
That is correct. The best current model involves alterations over numerous reproductive cycles (in eukaryotes) and some within current generations (for prokaryotes).
This model is developed from observed changes through reproductive cycles (in euks and proks), within a generation (in proks), and to some extent inferred through organizations of proks.
How the first prok came about is not known and remains highly theoretical. The best model is precursor material forming in environments (most likely marine) against catalytic surface materials (chiral clays).
There are no claims that these have been PROVEN. These are simply the best theoretical models given current knowledge.
Are you ready to share the ID model yet?
the theory of BS starts out with the complexity that needs explaining.
What is the theory of BS? And what complexity (please define, mathematically of course) needs to be explained?
holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)