Existence of Noah's Ark

Without being rude - it's horseshit - Ron Wyatt was a total fraud.People are generally equally split between him being mentally ill (and actually thinking the stuff he made up was real) or just a very good con man.Check out my Jesus's blood thread from a little while back - (Ron claimed to have found the blood of Jesus).Here's a few things to be ready for in any thread about Ron Wyatt:1) Evidence that nobody can find again - evil people steal it or Ron misplaced it.

​

2) Unnamed experts: In one classic exchange, one support of the fraud wyatt tried to cite the evidence of an expert who he could not name or even did not know if he really existed - we got this classic quote:

​

"There is nothing wrong with claiming an archaeologist said something--even if he does not reveal his name."

​

3) Attempts to "big up" wyatt rather than the evidence - lots of "he was brave/amazing" etc.

​

4) Attempts to fudge the subject by discussing his other frauds.We have seen it all before and we will see it all again....This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 09-12-2004 07:22 PM

Heh - OK, one I missed - watch out for really really long posts off certain people trying to fudge the issue....Wyatt shuffled off a few years ago.In regards to Jesus's blood (another of his frauds):http://EvC Forum: Blood of Jesus -->EvC Forum: Blood of Jesus

Noted M'lud - the other thread goes to character and was not offered for discussion.I'll move on to evidence item b.... "What it's been lost?"

more what? any form of actual rebuttal of other's views?

Would it not just be easier if we get the crevos to give us a list of all the laws of physics that were different "pre-flood"?This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-01-2004 02:40 PM

I don't think it's anything to do with you being a christian - I think it's because (and I will be totally blunt here), your posts are of such low quality that people are not really left with much room to move in terms of reply.most of your posts just seem to arrive straight off the top of your head and (for reasons I can't quite fathom) you seem totally unable to grasp what people are saying to you in their detailed rebuttals.You just pile absurity on top of absurity - the problem of People boiled alive by the amount of energy release? - well maybe gravity was lighter before the fload etc etc.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-04-2004 01:35 PM

quote:

---

Boiled alive, if thats true would disprove my theory. But being boiled alive is only a theory by rei. Other things may factor in, that would allow cooling of the atmosphere.

---

See this is the problem - you don't seem to understand what you are saying. For that for to be true (and thus for the flood to occur) would require quite different laws of physics than actually exist.If you want to say "goddunnit" - say that, why dance when you don't know the steps?This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-04-2004 06:15 PM

quote:

---

If water was exposed to the vacum of space with heat in it, before it could freeze it might boil off and lose its heat to space during that process. The boiling point of water lowers in a vacum.

---

And how does it get there? All you have done is open up a second front in your argument!This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-05-2004 09:19 AM

who keep telling you that it's rubbish - so why don't you accept that it will not float,fly or disappear into space?How many more people need to tell you this?

quote:

---

This book will now help me to add more valuable material to the massive upcoming post I still have pending. It totally will annihilate, obliterate, all the lame arguments ever raised in this forum about the site. I can see Charles Knight running down doggy street with his tail tucked between his legs.

---

While it's nice to see you - it's just more of the same old shit. What do you think I made this comment back in SEPT!!!!

quote:

---

I would ask that Lysimachus refrains from saying to posters that they change their tune once the evidence turns up and so forth.

​

If he wants has some evidence that he wants to present -present it - I don't want jam tomorrow, I want it today. If the evidence is not in a fit state to present at the moment, don't bring it up.

---

http://EvC Forum: Lysimachus- Thread via backdoor -->EvC Forum: Lysimachus- Thread via backdoorWhy don't you make your next post "the massive post"? Give us something to work with?Piss in the pot or get off it.(it's nice to see that the crackpots over at WAR can still turn a dime now that the chief crackpot is wormfood. )This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 23 February 2005 16:43 AM

Why don't you stop being a dodger and just post when you are actually ready?You have a good rep here and you are slowly eroding it with this game-playing, if you are not going to be ready for six months that's fine BUT as others have pointed out if you keep doing this trick you are going to become the boy who cried wolf.