Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda?
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 62 (148436)
10-08-2004 4:01 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by MrPhy42
10-08-2004 2:18 PM


quote:
Then, instead of hunting down the leader (as Bush promised he would at all costs before later stating that He didn't care where Bin Laden was, and that it was not a priority) he starts another war, in an unrelated country under false pretenses, and bad info, thus spreading our military thinner.
That boils it down to it's essence. The arguments from the White House have changed signifigantly over the last couple years. Before we attacked Afghanistan we were told that America was going after OBL. Now, the White House claims that we were there to disrupt Al Queda. Then, we went into Iraq to take away Saddam's stockpiles of WMD's before he gave them to terrorists. Now, the White House says that we interrupted "weapons programs" and freed the Iraqi people. Bush, as it turns out, isn't even consistent. My contention is that a lot of Americans can't see the difference between being resolute and being stubborn.
This message has been edited by Loudmouth, 10-08-2004 03:01 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by MrPhy42, posted 10-08-2004 2:18 PM MrPhy42 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by MrPhy42, posted 10-08-2004 7:29 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
MrPhy42
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 62 (148536)
10-08-2004 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Loudmouth
10-08-2004 4:01 PM


That isn't even the bestr part. With all of his changing stories, now apparently we went to war with Iraq because he was passing out his oil for food vouchers to others, and THAT is why why we went in. Whew, sure am glad we got that cleared up and have made sure to send a clear consistant message throughout this war. After all, is that not what Bush complains so much about when it comes to Kerry?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Loudmouth, posted 10-08-2004 4:01 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024