Phatboy
So you are saying that you make a wage comparable to the people who have been there thirty years and yet if you were not making money then you
would complain? Is it not the right {according to the parable} to be paid whatever the holder of the money deems correct?
Why don't you break up the union as there is no need according to the parable because the parable states that the one with the money dictate what should be paid.Do you have benefits? If so were they the result of bargaining through the union or was it something the person with the money felt they would pay you.
You earn 15.66 per hour yet if the man with the money came to you and said he would pay you 5.00 per hour then would you bitch and complain or should you follow the teaching of the parable.
I am really interested in your opinion on this.