Many people, including myself, would call what you just said the no true scottsman fallacy. You've created a definition of a christian that excludes just about everyone that you personally don't think worthy of being called christian.
Based on what you just said, buzsaw, whatever, riverrat, and a whole bunch of other homophobes on here aren't really christians because they want to take away people's rights, including my own, because they are homosexuals. I'd immagine that buz and his kind would disagree that hating homosexuals is the same thing as hating jews, but you get the idea.
If you want to go down the path of "he's not a christian because..." you will encounter a lot of hypocritical statements by many people.
It's not jar who you should be talking about the topic with. It should be buzsaw, whatever, riverrat, and other people like them that you should be debating with about what a christian really is.