Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Candy and games and responsibility.
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 91 of 94 (146969)
10-03-2004 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by CK
10-03-2004 6:49 AM


quote:
sounds about right - most corporations are pretty dysfunctional in lots of ways.
That's like saying, "Ted Bundy and Charles Manson are 'pretty dysfunctional in lots of ways.'"
Technically true, but grossly understated.
I was also looking for a reply to the second half of message #85.
quote:
No I would not rob you.
Why not?
What if it was legal to do so?
If an action isn't illegal, does that also mean it is ethical or moral?
Remember, the only reason you initially gave for not robbing me was because it was illegal, not because it was unethical or immoral.
Seriously, Charles, in the very few times you have responded to any example from Crash or myself in which we speak in personal, rather than abstract, terms WRT the people who make up an economy, you display a callous, devious attitude that seems devoid of conscience, save not being willing to break the law.
Even then, I get the feeling that you just don't want to get into trouble; if the law didn't exist to prevent you from getting more money for yourself or your company by immoral or unethical means, you would have no problem doing it.
Why don't you want to talk about how your individual actions affect the actual lives of real, living, breathing people?
Why do you refuse to address any example which requires you to empathise with a real person?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by CK, posted 10-03-2004 6:49 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by CK, posted 10-03-2004 12:59 PM nator has replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 92 of 94 (146987)
10-03-2004 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by nator
10-03-2004 10:18 AM


quote:
Why don't you want to talk about how your individual actions affect the actual lives of real, living, breathing people?
Why do you refuse to address any example which requires you to empathise with a real person?
dunno - Because I got really bored with this debate about twenty posts ago? I'm sure that you can mind-read me over the net and provide me with another answer.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-03-2004 02:04 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by nator, posted 10-03-2004 10:18 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by nator, posted 10-03-2004 4:57 PM CK has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2196 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 93 of 94 (147041)
10-03-2004 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by CK
10-03-2004 12:59 PM


quote:
dunno - Because I got really bored with this debate about twenty posts ago?
Eh, bored?
"Backed into a corner", I'd call it.
quote:
I'm sure that you can mind-read me over the net and provide me with another answer.
Um, why would I be trying so hard to get you to answer my specific questions regarding your individual code of business ethics if I was trying to mind read you?
I can imagine lots of things, and I can try to paint a picture for myself through what you post, and also what you avoid responding to, but I really don't know what you think.
That's why I'm asking you.
The sentiments you have been expressing WRT capitalism aren't anything new to me. I don't, however, relate to them at all. I would like to understand what motivates someone to embrace them as you clearly have.
I think that most people don't think at all about the consequences of their actions as consumers on the environment, other people, and themselves, but you clearly have.
Since most of the people I know who have thought about it have not gone down the "all I care about is price and fuck everybody else" road, I want to understand why you chose that way to think about it.
I mean, what IS your personal code of business ethics?
Is it OK to do anything to anybody as long as it doesn't break the letter of the law? Are there some things that you wouldn't do even if they were legal, even if they could make you lots of money?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by CK, posted 10-03-2004 12:59 PM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by CK, posted 10-13-2004 8:12 AM nator has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4154 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 94 of 94 (149617)
10-13-2004 8:12 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by nator
10-03-2004 4:57 PM


you know - I have been thinking of your claim that I am a sociopath.
I was under the impression that this described someone who is unable to understand the actions,needs and motivations of others (not able to put himself in other people's shoes)?
Well I can do that - but I still take the consious view not to care - That makes me amoral doesn't it?
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-13-2004 07:17 AM
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-13-2004 07:22 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by nator, posted 10-03-2004 4:57 PM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024