If you r reasonable Dan - surely you consider a supernatural creator as creating life - through creation, and then making it possibly evolve. How open are you to that possibility?
As soon as you can tell me what this creator is, and how it went about creating life, I'm more than open to considering it.
But as long as you're saying "I dunno", then why should I bother considering it?
Because it seems that these figures show that life is unlikely.
Without the work being shown, these figures are just pulled out of some guy's ass.
It's like me saying, "Math shows that there is no God. You see, the probability of there being no God is 1. Honest."
It's all good and well saying that life can adapt without showing it could in very inhospitable conditions.
The desert is inhospitable to humans. Life still exists there. It even thrives there.
remember Amhodli and Shraff didn't even back their assertions up
So go ahead and ask them to back their assertions up. I think they should... if someone asks them to do so.
"If I had to write ten jokes about potholders, I don't think I could do it. But I could write ten jokes about Catholicism in the next twenty minutes. I guess I'm drawn to religion because I can be provocative without harming something people
really care about, like their cars."
-George Meyer,
Simpsons writer