Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,810 Year: 3,067/9,624 Month: 912/1,588 Week: 95/223 Day: 6/17 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Humans of the future?
CK
Member (Idle past 4127 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 58 of 82 (151209)
10-19-2004 8:58 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by SEBASTES
10-19-2004 2:03 PM


Re: But Still!
quote:
LARGER BRAIN CAVITY: able to tap into and use 100% of the brain.
Help me out people - don't we already do this (just not all at the same time)?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by SEBASTES, posted 10-19-2004 2:03 PM SEBASTES has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by SEBASTES, posted 10-20-2004 11:45 PM CK has replied
 Message 63 by TechnoCore, posted 10-21-2004 8:02 AM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4127 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 62 of 82 (151525)
10-21-2004 4:47 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by SEBASTES
10-20-2004 11:45 PM


Re: But Still!
do you mean now or in the future?
Because if you mean now, that pure nonsense.
Do you understand what the term metaphysics means ? because it makes little sense in the context of your post.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-21-2004 05:45 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by SEBASTES, posted 10-20-2004 11:45 PM SEBASTES has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by SEBASTES, posted 10-21-2004 11:41 PM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4127 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 68 of 82 (151898)
10-22-2004 7:37 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by SEBASTES
10-22-2004 6:54 AM


Re: But Still!
Sebastes - there has never been any lab evidence (one very dubious case) of those powers.
We do not need to see evidence that those powers do not exist (we cannot prove such a negative) - however if you have any evidence to back the idea - let's see it.
I have researched this issue over a number of years, in language of the common man - it's total bollocks.
If you have evidence to the opposite, please share it with us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by SEBASTES, posted 10-22-2004 6:54 AM SEBASTES has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by SEBASTES, posted 10-22-2004 10:51 PM CK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024