Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence for the Slowing Down of Light
John
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 14 (15197)
08-11-2002 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by halcyonwaters
08-11-2002 4:54 AM


quote:
Originally posted by halcyonwaters:
If we see a ray of light that appears to be 12 billion years old, we're basing that off of saying it's 12 billion light years away, no?
The calculation is based on the constancy of the speed of light, yes. However, if the speed of light was greater than it is now for the first few seconds or few hundred million years after the big bang and then stablized at its current rate, the consequences for creationism are nil. The universe is still, basically far too old for Biblical Creation.
quote:
So if light has actually slown down, wouldn't that change how we estimate the ray of light's age?
Yup, the consequences of this discovery, if it holds, could be very dramatic. But, as above, the rate of slowdown isn't enough to drag us into the Biblical age of the universe.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-11-2002 4:54 AM halcyonwaters has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-11-2002 1:49 PM John has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 14 (15232)
08-11-2002 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by halcyonwaters
08-11-2002 1:49 PM


quote:
Originally posted by halcyonwaters:
Assumption of 12 Billion Years
Total Difference between Original Speed and Speed Now = D
Rate of Slow Down = 12,000,000,000/D
= Slow Rate of Change at beginning
Assumption of 6,000 years
Total Difference = D
Rate = 6,000/D
= Fast Rate of Change at beginning
Not being a astrophysicist, I don't know if that makes sense when all things considered.
David

Not being an astrophysicist, I'm not sure it makes sense either but I don't get it. Sorry, but I have completely missed your point.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by halcyonwaters, posted 08-11-2002 1:49 PM halcyonwaters has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024