Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8905 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 04-20-2019 8:14 PM
24 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, edge, Tangle, Theodoric (5 members, 19 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 849,925 Year: 4,962/19,786 Month: 1,084/873 Week: 440/376 Day: 71/46 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
2
Author Topic:   Does your steryotypical believer actually exist?
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4656
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 16 of 19 (153043)
10-26-2004 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by PaulK
10-26-2004 3:47 AM


Okay I'm ill today Crash - I'll respond to you a bit later on, but I have not responded to Paul's posts so I will put him first on this occasion.

could point to a particularly illogical believer who insisted that what I said was wrong because he didn't like what he thought I'd said

Paul, I have the feeling that this means me. - don't be angry at me because of this topic. but if I was saying you were wrong - you could well be right aswell - I was probably just being stubborn.

If I criticise a believers arguments for being illogical it is because they are.

Fair enough, if you think that the arguments are illogical then you are simply obeying what you think is true. So, there will be many believers who have illogical arguments - I don't deny this, and the problem is that there actually might be a steryotypical emotional believer - but I can't really stop their tongues.

This topic is also a chance to show that emotional chumps might exist.

I will adress Crash and Gilgamesh later on.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by PaulK, posted 10-26-2004 3:47 AM PaulK has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by mikehager, posted 10-26-2004 1:59 PM mike the wiz has not yet responded
 Message 18 by Nighttrain, posted 10-26-2004 8:11 PM mike the wiz has responded

  
mikehager
Member (Idle past 4573 days)
Posts: 534
Joined: 09-02-2004


Message 17 of 19 (153081)
10-26-2004 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by mike the wiz
10-26-2004 11:14 AM


Logic, science and reason.
Logic is a system whereby one can determine if a conclusion can validly be drawn from a set of premises. It has nothing to say about the factual truth of those premises or conclusions.

Science is a method for establishing facts about the natural world and formulating theories to explain them.

Reason in this context is a more nebulous concept, and I doubt it really belongs in a set with the other two. That being said, valid logical arguments may be made for theism, but I have yet to see one where the premises are good and can stand a challenge. Also, unless a deity allows itself to be studied in a controlled environment, science has nothing to say on the subject.

So, logic and science have no real bearing on belief in a deity, and reason is so nebulous a term (in this context) that I think it must be disregarded.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 10-26-2004 11:14 AM mike the wiz has not yet responded

    
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 2099 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 18 of 19 (153140)
10-26-2004 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by mike the wiz
10-26-2004 11:14 AM


Ah,Mike, you`re too good-natured and humorous to be a Creo----come over to the Dark Side. :-)
This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 10-26-2004 11:14 AM mike the wiz has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by mike the wiz, posted 10-26-2004 8:25 PM Nighttrain has not yet responded

    
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4656
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 19 of 19 (153145)
10-26-2004 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Nighttrain
10-26-2004 8:11 PM


Haha. Thanks but I still have a few enemies that hate my guts because I "used" to be a YEC here in EvC critterclub.

Honestly though - unlike your average creo - I have no argument against the ToE, I have difficulty believing it happened is all, but that's my problem not science's. So - the only difference between an evo and me is that I see evolution as a possible system used by God, I think it is scientific - not religious, and that it is probably the best theory to fit the facts. However - I admitt it is only a possible truth in my own mind. I guess I am a fence-sitter but in all honesty - I am not a classic "creo". I will even settle for Big Bang Theory and evolution if I have to, and it wouldn't bother my beliefs too much.

Hope you understand.

Back soon.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Nighttrain, posted 10-26-2004 8:11 PM Nighttrain has not yet responded

  
Prev1
2
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019