quote:
Yes it would be proof if the earth was that young. Creationists have plenty of it confirming the Bible. Its not a fact that the earth is billions of yrs old.
If the Genesis account were literally accurate, then EVERYTHING would have to be 6,000-12,000 years old. Falsifying evidence is important as well. It is not a fact that the Earth is billions of years old, but every piece of evidence on the Earth fits with the theory. The evidence does not fit an Earth that is 12,000 years old. This is how science is done, the search for supporting AND falsifying evidence. The fact that creationists focus just on supporting evidence removes them from the field of science.
quote:
Its fact for Evolutionists but not general science. Although the theory of Evolution has completely taken over mainstream science.
The age of the earth is part of geology, not biology of which evolution is a part of. Evolution has taken over science just like other supported theories, like heliocentrism, the Germ Theory of Disease, Special Relativity, and other theories that are supported and NOT FALSIFIED. The fact that young earth creationism is no longer part of science is that it was falsified by the evidence. Until you can explain the falsifying evidence, your long list of supporting evidence means squat. Again, this is how science is done. If you think young earth creationism should be part of science, then you must deal with the complete list of evidence.