Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,818 Year: 3,075/9,624 Month: 920/1,588 Week: 103/223 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Interpretation of Evidence Colored by "GodSenseless" worldview
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 4 of 74 (149788)
10-13-2004 10:19 PM


Thread moved here from the Faith and Belief forum.
Moved here as I think this forum is closer to the right home for it. I suppose it doesn't matter all that much.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 10-13-2004 09:20 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by RAZD, posted 10-14-2004 12:02 AM AdminNosy has not replied
 Message 16 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-15-2004 5:28 PM AdminNosy has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 37 of 74 (151781)
10-21-2004 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by coffee_addict
10-21-2004 8:15 PM


Different kinds of truth???
At some point in this discussion everyone was careful to separate "truth" about the natural world from other kinds of truth.
I think that has been lost sight of.
Could you all clarify just what you are talking about??

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by coffee_addict, posted 10-21-2004 8:15 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by coffee_addict, posted 10-21-2004 8:26 PM AdminNosy has replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 39 of 74 (151787)
10-21-2004 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by coffee_addict
10-21-2004 8:26 PM


Crack pot ideas
That they are crack pot is your view.
That they are not ammenable to scientific analysis (at present) may still be the case.
I'd like to see the two of you separate what things you do think and do not think are of the "natural world"
Willowtree, you were asked at the beginning of this thread and have been since asked to show how a different result could be achieved with your worldview.
You don't seem to be about to do that. In which case this is a waste of time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by coffee_addict, posted 10-21-2004 8:26 PM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-26-2004 11:07 PM AdminNosy has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 63 of 74 (154365)
10-30-2004 3:07 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Cold Foreign Object
10-29-2004 11:07 PM


Thanks WT
I'm not following or reading this very closely. But your post here seems to be an honest attempt to answer the question put to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-29-2004 11:07 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 74 of 74 (155488)
11-03-2004 1:44 PM


Thread copied to the The Interpretation of Evidence Colored by "GodSenseless" worldview thread in the Boot Camp forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024