That they are crack pot is your view.
That they are not ammenable to scientific analysis (at present) may still be the case.
I'd like to see the two of you separate what things you do think and do not think are of the "natural world"
Willowtree, you were asked at the beginning of this thread and have been since asked to show how a different result could be achieved with your worldview.
You don't seem to be about to do that. In which case this is a waste of time.