Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quantized redshifts strongly suggest that our galaxy is at the centre of the universe
halcyonwaters
Inactive Member


Message 91 of 170 (15493)
08-15-2002 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Joe Meert
08-15-2002 7:21 AM


--JM: Actually, the message of creationists is to accept 'truth' as defined by a small sect of christianity. You assume that one cannot be a christian and also accept that science got it right. Many christians behold evolution on an old earth being in perfect harmony with an all powerful god and fully consistent with the scriptures because the scriptures are not a scientific treatise. What you are arguing is that you have the singular handle on 'christian truth'. That's a rather pompous and self-serving statement and is inconsistent with the beliefs of many other Christians.
Cheers
Joe Meert--
There is no indication anywhere in the Bible, that Genesis should not be taken literally. Quite the opposite - it is qouted as history all over the old and new testaments.
Faith: Bible is the Word of God
Faith: God wrote the Bible, so we could know Truth
Conclusion: Only God's interpretation of the Bible is correct.
Now, if God wants us to know the truth, what is the only possible way for everyone to come to the same conclusions in the Bible? By reading it in a straight-forward manner -- not using your imaginations/preconcieved ideas.
Based on the above, there is a right way and a wrong way to read the Bible. That is why, one can be firm on a certain conclusion of the Bible, and not at the same time be arrogant. If you want to say Evolution fits in the Bible, you must go about it like this...
"You're going in with six days in mind. But abandon that, and read Genesis the way it was written. Don't you get evolution from it?"
David

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Joe Meert, posted 08-15-2002 7:21 AM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024