Magnetic Field Predictions

Are you referring to the predictions made by Humphrey concerning the magnetic field strengths of Uranus and Neptune? His predictions were that the fields were about 100 000 times what mainstream science had predicted, and he was proven right when Voyager made the measurements.However, I don't think there is a thread here regarding that (I may be wrong, maybe there is?)

quote:

---

"Tiger Woods will finish the PGA championship with a 4 round total between 0 and 600000."

​

How tough is that?

---

Didn't he predict that the magnetic field would be about 100 000 times that of evolutionary predictions in the Creation Research Society Quarterly article in December, 1984? And the result was smack bang in the middle, about 100 000 times? He predicted the dipole moment strength to be "on the order of 10^24 J/T". The dipole moment for Uranus is 3.7 x 10^24 J/T, while for Neptune it is 2.1 x 10^24 J/T, which agree with his prediction in one order of magnitude, and disagrees with the evolutionary prediction by about 5 magnitudes.[This message has been edited by blitz77, 08-19-2002]

their [geophysicists']model-the dynamo model I believe?
The dynamo model is the evolutionist old earth model.
Also, both Uranus and Neptune have sharply tilted magnetic fields. According to the dynamo model, it would be when they are undergoing a magnetic reversal. However, it is unlikely that they should be undergoing this reversal at the same time.[This message has been edited by blitz77, 08-19-2002]