Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Origin of Life ⇒

The lies behind the Miller experiment

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The lies behind the Miller experiment
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4

Normal Thread Display
Message 6 of 115 (155818)
11-04-2004 10:30 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by JESUS freak
11-02-2004 5:13 PM

The Miller experiment did not prove anything.
​
It proved organic compounds could arise through non-organic processes.
​
The miller experiment may be fifty years old, but it is still one of the most prominent arguments for evolution.
​
The miller experiment (or Miller-Urey experiment to give credit where credit is due) has exactly nothing to do with evolution, and is most certainly therefore not a prominent argument for it.
​
This message has been edited by Mr Jack, 11-04-2004 10:31 AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JESUS freak, posted 11-02-2004 5:13 PM JESUS freak has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by JESUS freak, posted 11-04-2004 3:54 PM Dr Jack has not replied
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4

Normal Thread Display
Message 60 of 115 (157210)
11-08-2004 10:01 AM 		Reply to: Message 58 by JESUS freak
11-08-2004 9:50 AM

Re: An explanation of evolution
JF,
​
Please, for the record, tell us if you understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by JESUS freak, posted 11-08-2004 9:50 AM JESUS freak has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024