Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,803 Year: 4,060/9,624 Month: 931/974 Week: 258/286 Day: 19/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Question for Mammuthus
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 1 of 7 (15831)
08-21-2002 9:45 AM


In some thread, you indicated that to date the DNA that has been recovered from mammoths is only bits and pieces. IOW, there wasn't enough to sequence anything resembling a full genome. CNN (a major source of misinformation to start with) has an article today about some group of Japanese scientists who plan on starting a "Jurassic Park" type of "cloning" experiment using recovered DNA and an African elephant (as host mother, apparently). Here's the link. Is this typical journalist over-enthusiasm, speculation, or even remotely legit? In 50 years, with what has been recovered to date, can they really recreate a critter "88%" (odd figure, that) mammoth? Or are they talking out their collective cloaca?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Mammuthus, posted 08-26-2002 6:02 AM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 3 of 7 (16068)
08-26-2002 6:18 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Mammuthus
08-26-2002 6:02 AM


Thanks for your post M. I figured it was something like that. I don't generally get my science from CNN , but someone forwarded the link and I thought I'd take shameless advantage of your expertise. Much appreciate your response.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Mammuthus, posted 08-26-2002 6:02 AM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Mammuthus, posted 08-26-2002 11:44 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5899 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 6 of 7 (16097)
08-27-2002 3:30 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Tranquility Base
08-26-2002 7:11 PM


Uhh, TB? That's precisely the report M and I were discussing. Re-read his response (post #2).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Tranquility Base, posted 08-26-2002 7:11 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024