Message 19 of 19 (15839)
08-21-2002 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by John Paul
08-20-2002 12:36 PM
Originally posted by John Paul:
The fact that you misrepresented and almost always do, is obvious. Once again the links I provided were NOT about mutations.
I know that, have EXPLAINED that, and have indicated why I wrote what I did. That you have adopted the ReMine shuffle (cry 'Misrepresentation!' at every chance) does not surproise me.
They are about the fact that the alleged ancestor from 10 million years ago did NOT have those adaptations.
Maybe, maybe not. So where in those largely irrelevant links is it explained that some huge number of mutations is required to generate those traits - that is, afterall, why ReMine mentiones them. THAT is the crux of the issue.
The article did not indicate that some huge number was probably not required. It stated that there are more than that one gene that are responsible.
Oh, so it did not say that some huge number is not required, therefore, some huge number must BE required! Brilliant cretin logic!
The only waste of anything on this DB is you.
Wow. That was a major zinger. You really got me with that one!
I notice that you still have not provided any actual evidence that ReMine's bastardization of Haldane applies to ancestral primate populations.
I notice that you have yet to provide any objective tests for any of your claims - implicit or explicit.
I know why, of course.
I also know why you abandoned the 'questions' thread...
It must be tough to handle actually having your hat handed to you in such a public way.
Or was it feeding you your lunch?
[This message has been edited by SLPx, 08-21-2002]
|This message is a reply to:|
| ||Message 14 by John Paul, posted 08-20-2002 12:36 PM|| ||John Paul has not yet responded|