Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,796 Year: 4,053/9,624 Month: 924/974 Week: 251/286 Day: 12/46 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Has anyone seen god?
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 3 of 60 (159343)
11-14-2004 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by sidelined
11-14-2004 12:07 PM


Did Jesus have a face?
If Jesus was God, then wouldn't looking Jesus in the face be equivelant to looking God in the face?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by sidelined, posted 11-14-2004 12:07 PM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by arachnophilia, posted 11-14-2004 4:31 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 5 by Phat, posted 11-14-2004 5:49 PM Brian has replied
 Message 8 by Zachariah, posted 11-15-2004 3:09 AM Brian has replied
 Message 57 by Buzsaw, posted 01-30-2007 4:19 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 13 of 60 (159618)
11-15-2004 5:03 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Angel
11-15-2004 4:49 AM


Peniel
Hi Angel,
Gen.32:30~~~ If you read the whole chapter, you would notice at the beginning where it says angels of the Lord, following on, in his dreams he wrestles with a man. Which gives him the mental vision of seeing God. Unless you prefer to think that he really did wrestle with God in the flesh in Genesis?
I prefer to interpret that verse as Jacob fighting with God as he named the place where this happened 'Peniel' which means 'Face of God'/'God's Face'.
I believe that Jacob verifies that he saw God's face when he adds that he has called the place Peniel.
This is further qualified by Jacob when he states that the place is called Peniel because: It is because I saw God face to face, and yet my life was spared."
This appears to suggest that Jacob believed that if anyone sees God face to face then they will die, but as he has saw God's face and is spared then he is thankful.
There would be no reason for Jacob to qualify the naming if he had not seen God's face.
Is there some problem caused if someone has seen God's face and lived?
Does this really make a difference to anything?
Cheers.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Angel, posted 11-15-2004 4:49 AM Angel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by dpardo, posted 11-15-2004 8:02 AM Brian has replied
 Message 24 by Angel, posted 11-15-2004 5:20 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 14 of 60 (159623)
11-15-2004 5:18 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Zachariah
11-15-2004 3:09 AM


Re: Did Jesus have a face?
Hi Z,
It was just a thought I had really, if Jesus was God then many people saw his face, thus they saw God's face.
We do get to see the face of God the Son, we do not get to see the face of God the Father.
If they are one and the same then is it at least possible that Jesus' face is indeed God's face?
I personally do not see what all the fuss is about.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Zachariah, posted 11-15-2004 3:09 AM Zachariah has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 15 of 60 (159624)
11-15-2004 5:20 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Phat
11-14-2004 5:49 PM


Re: Did Jesus have a face?
Hi Phat,
I am outside. The sunlight is on my face. If the light comes from the Sun, would not the light upon my skin be equivalent to having the Sun touching me? What do you think, Brian?
Sounds fine to me.
brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Phat, posted 11-14-2004 5:49 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Phat, posted 04-25-2006 3:15 AM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 18 of 60 (159667)
11-15-2004 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by dpardo
11-15-2004 8:02 AM


But God does lie.
Hi Dpardo,
But Genesis 32 contradicts Hosea, it is clearly not an angel that Jacob wrestles with, there is no mention of an angel in the Genesis reference, if it was an angel then why name the area Peniel?
Hosea doesnt actually mention a 'man' at all in his text, and the context of the Genesis quote does not make sense if it was an angel.
Look at the context:
26 Then the man said, "Let me go, for it is daybreak."
But Jacob replied, "I will not let you go unless you bless me."
27 The man asked him, "What is your name?"
"Jacob," he answered.
28 Then the man said, "Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, [5] because you have struggled with God and with men and have overcome."
29 Jacob said, "Please tell me your name."
But he replied, "Why do you ask my name?" Then he blessed him there.
There is no mention of an angel in this encounter, and I do not see how an angel could bless anyone.
Why would Jacob say he saw God face to face if he had been fighting an angel?
The name change to 'Israel' is directly linked to this encounter as well.
As for God being a liar, what is the big deal about that?
The Bible informs us that God does tell lies. He sends false prophest to test Israel's faithfulness, amongst other things.
Deuteronomy 13:1-3
1 If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a miraculous sign or wonder, 2 and if the sign or wonder of which he has spoken takes place, and he says, "Let us follow other gods" (gods you have not known) "and let us worship them," 3 you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The LORD your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul.
A prophet is simply a man or woman who speaks God's words, God invariably puts the words in their mouth, a la Moses.
The above verse tells us that God will send a prophet to deliberately mislead Israel to test her loyalty. The prophet will announce a sign or wonder that will come to pass, but the prophet will say it is in the name of another God. The mention of the wonder being done in the name of another god is a lie, the sign would have been from Yahweh and Yahweh told the prophet to say it was in some other god's name. Thus God is a known liar, no big deal in ancient near eastern literature.
If Yahweh is to be considered a god then He needs to be able to do anything, including telling lies.
There is also the possibility that it was Hosea who was the liar, if it is a lie that is. After all, it was Hosea who allegedly wrote the text, although this has to be taken on faith.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by dpardo, posted 11-15-2004 8:02 AM dpardo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by arachnophilia, posted 11-15-2004 11:10 AM Brian has not replied
 Message 20 by dpardo, posted 11-15-2004 2:28 PM Brian has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 42 of 60 (160041)
11-16-2004 8:09 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Angel
11-15-2004 5:20 PM


Re: Peniel
Hi Angel,
This presents a problem, if God was on land, as a man, because you would have to have a body to wrestle, I would assume.
Anything is possible with God, if he wanted to manifest himself in physical form then that would not be a problem.
So if you take this literally, it would present a problem with Jesus being the Only Begotten, wouldn't it?
I dont see why it would. God taking human form is different from Jesus' case. Jesus is said to have an earthly mother. This requires a 'begat', but the earlier incident doesn't.
If God was in the flesh then, thousands of years earlier, where does Jesus fit in?
Jesus doesn't fit in anywhere in the Old Testament, and as I said the situation is totally different.
The chapter repeats the fact that it happens at night, or in a dream, and obviously when we dream we are not physically wresting with someone, at least not in mine.
Do you also hurt your hip so bad in dreams that you cannot walk
It appears that Jacob did.
Cheers.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Angel, posted 11-15-2004 5:20 PM Angel has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 58 of 60 (381505)
01-31-2007 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Buzsaw
01-30-2007 4:19 PM


Re: Did Jesus have a face?
Jesus is the son of God, a man. God the father is not a man. He is the father of Jesus.
But a man is someone who has human parents, Jesus didn't have a human father so He could not be a man, He must have been something different.
If you see me, you do not see my father, though I may resemble him.
So your father was a god as well was he?
Jesus was supposed to be God incarnate so it is logical that Jesus looked like God.
Is Jesus God?
So on earth you see a very close image of God, but you do not see God.
Have you seen God?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Buzsaw, posted 01-30-2007 4:19 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 01-31-2007 10:24 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4986 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 60 of 60 (382830)
02-06-2007 4:42 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
01-31-2007 10:24 PM


Re: Did Jesus have a face?
He often referred to himself as "son of man," meaning he was a human being human born.
But He wasn’t human born, human born requires a human mother and father, and we are told Jesus’ father was God. Can you tell me another human whose father wasn’t human?
He was different, nevertheless, a man.
Different but the same?
Someone with a god for a daddy is not human.
Paul said, "I Timothy 2:5 "For there is one God, one mediator also between God and men, himself man, Christ Jesus, who gave himself a ransom for all;......."
Well Paul said a lot of things that are absolute crap.
Ask him.
He’s dead, been dead for about 2000 years, if He ever existed that is.
He has always referred to himself as the son of God
Buz, we are all sons of God.
or as the son of man.
He wasn’t the only one referred to as ”son of man’ though. How often was Ezekiel referred to as son of man?
depending on the context of his statement.
Well, to understand the context of his statement you need to understand what these terms mean.
He represents man before God as man's advocate.
Yes we all know the myths, and we all know how ludicrous they are, especially the ”sacrifice’ that wasn’t a sacrifice.
Brian: "Have you seen God?"
Buzz: No. I thought I made that clear.
Okay, so you do not know what God looks like.
You do not know what Jesus looks like.
So, you do not know if they are identical or not.
Here’s some logic.
Jesus is God.
Jesus had a face.
Therefore, Jesus’ face was God’s face.
Simple innit?
Brian

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 01-31-2007 10:24 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024