The Whole Jesus Thing

Well, that is how it was interpreted by the Jews. One of the more charming aspects of the ancient writings, (unless someone makes a stupid
promise to sacrifice the first thing they see once they get home)..

What, going aroudn preaching, over turning tables , throwing temper tantrums at fig trees, and talking about lessons from the Hillel branch of Pharaseedism??Don't see much special about either the life or death.. except for the miracles that I am sure didn't happen. Beside, deutronomy specifically warns against using miracles to 'prove' a prophet.

Yes, I am sure tha miracles didn't exist. Can you provide any evidence from outside the bible they did? I can point to other myths that point to other miracles, such as the Gods sending angels down to ignite the funeral pyre of Julius Ceasar when there were arguements about how to do it, or the Ceasar Vespitan being able to cure the blind and deaf with a touch of his hand. Do you believe those miracles?

That is your opinion. Can you provide evidence of it from any place other than wishful thinking and the bible is the question.

Yes, I can be. I might not be able to PROVE it, but then, I can't PROVE that little green men have been abducting people either.

You can't even provide objective secular evidence from before 70 C.E. that this Jesus guy even existed, much less that 1) he was a prophet, or 2) that he was the son of god.And my quote from the Tanakh showed that people who follow the old testament that Jesus is not god. And yes, people CAN reject books that are written later, on the basis it contradicts the earlier books. I also could use a different interpretation on those words that were attributed to Jesus too..

One thing you have to realise, the 'version' of psalm 22 that is quoted is a mistranslation from the hebrew. The phrase ""k'ari" does not mean 'pierced', but 'like a lion'. It is translated properly in sections near that, but apparently the early christian translators needed to have
some kind of prophecy to be fullfilled, so they manufactored one.

I think they introduced the mistranslation. There is no reason ot have the word 'pierced' there otherwise, particularly since the word is translated properly in other psalms.