Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 0/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Whole Jesus Thing
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 209 of 286 (158615)
11-12-2004 2:04 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yaro
12-06-2003 2:14 AM


I just saw this thread and thought I'd put in my thoughts...
When you try to see things from God's perspective, it does seem rather ridiculous.. the whole dying and condemning thing...
But then how do you really know what it is like to see things from God's perspective? We don't have a clue... so why try?
All we can do is see things from our perspective.
So... from my perspective: I see myself as a creature that is living by God's decision. Without him I would have no physical life and without him I would have no hope of something beyond this physical life. And I have done nothing to deserve anything more. Now in order for a finite being with free-will to eternally dwell with an infinite supreme being, perhaps two things are inherently necessary: faith and obedience. I mean if God is infinite and I am finite, there's gonna be a lot of surprises and adventures to come so I must be able to trust him. And perhaps the thing called "evil" is an inherent product of the coexistence of a willful finite being with a willful infinite being. So obedience must be one of our characteristics if we are to be apart of God without becoming evil in rebellion.
Now it is true that God knew what the whole package would include when he formed the universe, but can you conceive of a more perfect way to refine in his creatures the qualities of faith and obedience while at the same time illuminating the qualities of his character? My puny brain certainly cannot.
If this God wants to communicate to us that he loves us and desires a relationship with us, he must do so in terms we can understand... in fact every bit of our so called understanding is only a picture of something too great for our finite brains to comprehend.
So if God wants to show love to us, how might he do it? I know that I personally get all choked up watching war movies when one soldier gives his life for his buddies or his sweetheart back home. "There is no greater love than for one man to give his life for another." So God becomes a man and dies for us to communicate this love to us.
God taught us obedience by giving us law. And if God is good you would expect the law to generally follow what we intuitively know to be good. And Jesus said loving God and loving others summed it all up. He gave us bodies that were suceptible to breaking the law to test our will to see if it will obey his. He knew full well we couldn't live up to it, so He showed us that he would not hold our sins against us. How can he prove it? Pour them out on Christ. And that just happens to teach us about his justice righteousness and mercy as well.
And I could go on, but you're getting bored...
The whole point of Christ is not so that God can set up some extravagant obstacle course and hand the prize to the only ones foolish enough to go through it. The point is to teach us about God and to refine those characteristics which are necessary for God to have a relationship with us.
You're free to disagree. This whole argument will be based on our assumptions so any arguing is really pointless. In the end it all boils down to faith.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yaro, posted 12-06-2003 2:14 AM Yaro has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by contracycle, posted 11-12-2004 5:13 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 213 of 286 (158657)
11-12-2004 9:12 AM
Reply to: Message 212 by contracycle
11-12-2004 5:13 AM


No, it does not, as has been pointed out to you repeatedly and at great length. Science is not driven by faith, it is driven by knowledge.I'd thank you to take this theistic arrogance and stuff it where the sun don't shine.
Contracycle, can you tell me what this topic is about? Then please tell me what science has to do with this topic.
Stop making DA OT posts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by contracycle, posted 11-12-2004 5:13 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by contracycle, posted 11-12-2004 9:16 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 219 of 286 (158811)
11-12-2004 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by ramoss
11-12-2004 10:31 AM


Re: Where is it?
The servant of god is the nation of Isreal. The writer of that portion of Isaiah says so himself, just previous to Isaiah 53.
Where? I can't seem to find what you're talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by ramoss, posted 11-12-2004 10:31 AM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by ramoss, posted 11-12-2004 4:29 PM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 262 of 286 (159960)
11-15-2004 9:51 PM
Reply to: Message 260 by ramoss
11-15-2004 8:15 PM


Re: So what is the issue?
except for the miracles that I am sure didn't happen.
How are you sure?
Beside, deutronomy specifically warns against using miracles to 'prove' a prophet.
Jesus was more than a prophet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by ramoss, posted 11-15-2004 8:15 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 263 by ramoss, posted 11-16-2004 8:27 AM Hangdawg13 has replied
 Message 264 by ramoss, posted 11-16-2004 8:28 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 265 of 286 (160322)
11-17-2004 1:30 AM
Reply to: Message 263 by ramoss
11-16-2004 8:27 AM


Re: So what is the issue?
Yes, I am sure tha miracles didn't exist.
You can't be a hundred percent sure that miracles do not ever or have not ever occured. Since there is no scientific evidence for it you use Ocam's razor and eliminate it from your considerations, but that does not mean you know that they did not happen.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by ramoss, posted 11-16-2004 8:27 AM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by ramoss, posted 11-17-2004 7:33 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 266 of 286 (160324)
11-17-2004 1:37 AM
Reply to: Message 264 by ramoss
11-16-2004 8:28 AM


Re: So what is the issue?
That is your opinion. Can you provide evidence of it from any place other than wishful thinking and the bible is the question.
You're talking about my statement that Jesus was more than a prophet?
I was simply correcting your assertion that he was merely a prophet. You used Deuteronomy to say that Jesus was un-Biblical by performing miracles. If you are going to base your argument on a passage from the Bible, then you can also trust Jesus' words, "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life...". Jesus claimed to be the Son of God, which is more than any other prophet claimed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by ramoss, posted 11-16-2004 8:28 AM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by arachnophilia, posted 11-17-2004 4:13 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied
 Message 269 by ramoss, posted 11-17-2004 7:41 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024