Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8913 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 06-16-2019 8:29 AM
23 online now:
AZPaul3, Percy (Admin), RAZD (3 members, 20 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Arnold Wolf
Post Volume:
Total: 853,803 Year: 8,839/19,786 Month: 1,261/2,119 Week: 21/576 Day: 21/50 Hour: 0/3

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Kendemyer
Inactive Suspended Member

Message 16 of 19 (160173)
11-16-2004 4:24 PM

TO: Brian
From: you know who (kendemyer ???? )

If you are going to make the allegation that I do not defend my threads across the internet you should adequately defend that allegation. I think you are still smarting over our threads we locked horns in such as the "The Bible and the Hittites, Exploding another 'Biblical Archaeology' Myth" at: www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=1&t=151&p=5 -->www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=1&t=151&p=5">http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=1&t=151&p=5 . I also relayed some archeological information to some evcforum members that support a early date for the exodus by the way (see: http://www.christiancourier.com/archives/israelExodus.htm and http://www.angelfire.com/nm/massimolorenzini/exodus.html By the way, I will admit for a few months I did not attend to a few threads here but considering the argumentation made against them I would hope that some members of would understand.

It is true that at one forum people did not reply to my threads. That is because they were threads that were in a non-postable forum! Brian makes assumptions based on his speculations once again perhaps.


Also, in regards to my satire I am glad that some professed atheist enjoyed it. At the same time, I found the professed atheists at trying to wriggle out of the compelling evidence for the Bible and using transparent methods of shutting down debate thorugh admin meddling because their side was badly losing to provide some comic relief. For example, Adminmooseus could not bear the social science data in regards to theist and their less religious counterparts so he banned me and then claimed that I was the clown when his avatar and his behavior show who in fact the clown really is! (For the social science data please see: www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=15&t=260&p=5 -->www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=15&t=260&p=5">http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=15&t=260&p=5).

Lastly, in regards to my permanent or semi-permanent banning, I will say that if I am permanently banned I will see that as a victory of course. Unable to refute the Bible and creationist evidence I presented those who profess the materialist philosophy at had no other choice but to ban me. And of course this would be futile. If I wanted to relay my evidence via proxies who could merely reword my material here and there if they so wish, you would have no idea it was sponsored from me and the Christian evidence I choose would continue to be posted at your site. I could easily recruit some proxies I know from www.theologyweb.com or www.apologetics.org In fact, I know of four people at who would be very willing to do so right now. So you can futilely ban me if you wish but you will have truly accomplished nothing. Remember your history, proxies and allies can be very effective.

By the way, I do not plan on posting in this thread again.

This message has been edited by charlesdarwin, 11-16-2004 04:44 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-16-2004 4:47 PM charlesdarwin has not yet responded

Posts: 3883
Joined: 09-26-2002

Message 17 of 19 (160183)
11-16-2004 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by charlesdarwin
11-16-2004 4:24 PM

Yes, it's Ken again
charlesdarwin has been suspended, and his e-mail address has been banned.

Absolutely no sympathy,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by charlesdarwin, posted 11-16-2004 4:24 PM charlesdarwin has not yet responded

Member (Idle past 3122 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002

Message 18 of 19 (160326)
11-17-2004 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by lfen
11-16-2004 3:09 PM

Re: The Scarlett Kenkernel"
It is a good idea, but I think he has decided to go for good this time!

We seem to have WT and David about to fall out over the pyramid gimmick, that should be as equally entertaining as Ken v. David.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by lfen, posted 11-16-2004 3:09 PM lfen has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by lfen, posted 11-17-2004 4:31 AM Brian has not yet responded

Member (Idle past 2840 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004

Message 19 of 19 (160357)
11-17-2004 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Brian
11-17-2004 1:40 AM

Re: The Scarlett Kenkernel"
We seem to have WT and David about to fall out over the pyramid gimmick, that should be as equally entertaining as Ken v. David.

heh heh, yup

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Brian, posted 11-17-2004 1:40 AM Brian has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019