Origin of Translation

There's no evidence that such a Designer existed or could have existed. Probably in the view supported by the methodology with proven results. That would be the methodological naturalism of the scientific method.But science isn't a place for faith, and the origin of life is not a question of faith. You shouldn't be so quick to demand a settling of the question when we're hardly looked into it, yet. There's much to discover about the origin of life. Why can't "I don't know yet" be an appropriate answer to that question? The one that is correct. I, for one, do not allow what I want to be true to affect my conception of what is true, and I don't understand why a rational person would think otherwise. What does it matter which one of those interpretations we want to be true?The one we should "believe in" is the one that is right. Which one is that? We don't know yet. Why isn't that answer good enough for you?

So, because you don't like not knowing, you have to make something up instead?Look, buddy, grow up. We live in a world of uncertainty, a world of imperfect knowledge. Learning to deal with that is how we become adults, instead of children who cling to fairy tales because ignorance is scary. No. I'm just an adult.

Yeah.Because we can go to factories and see people building cars just like mine.So tell me where I can go to to see God hard at work making people. As far as I've ever seen, the only thing making people is people. By what method do you distinguish the work of God's hand from the things that just happen because of the laws of physics?

Yes. Because we've seen humans create cabinets. I can't stress that enough. Show me where I can watch God creating things.We never infer design from the object. It's not possible. We infer design because we observe designers.

By looking, maybe?