Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What qualifications make up an Expert?
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4019 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 5 of 12 (164598)
12-02-2004 5:32 AM


Well, while I can`t define an 'expert' to the satisfaction of all, I would like to point out that in many lawsuits, the defence can usually find an 'expert' to refute the plaintiff`s 'expert.'

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by CK, posted 12-02-2004 6:04 AM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4019 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 12 of 12 (164802)
12-03-2004 12:18 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by NosyNed
12-02-2004 10:57 AM


Re: Personal
Hi, Ned, it`s interesting how the fame of forensic experts goes before them, so that now the 'expert' IS the evidence. We had a notorious case overturned in Australia after the famous expert from England had his evidence refuted after the case was over.Likewise the link talks of two famous FBI scientists who cribbed the evidence to sustain their record.
http://www.law-forensic.com/cfr_gen_art_17.htm
In view of the widespread use of DNA as identification, it seems the legal profession has already found a possible weakness with their approach to the prosecutor`s fallacy and the defence attorney`s fallacy.
Error

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by NosyNed, posted 12-02-2004 10:57 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024