Existence of Demons (and Angels)

I saw a program where a fireman testified that he was saved by an angel. He said he was trapped in a building, and because obviously - he had experience, he sat down as he was tired, and trapped, - and he basically said that he just accepted it was over, and just waited to die. Then, he saw a light, and it grew brighter - and became an angel. Female variety aswell - the best kind. . Anyway, she pointed out a way through to a door amongst the smoke and he stumbled out o' there.Ofcourse - I can't remember the program, it was on discovery channel. If you watch discovery for the next half-century, it might come on again. I suggest a full reading of my Hypothesis of consciousness which actually proves God exists. Message #6 and #15 prove God exists. Here it is, un-refuted.This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 12-05-2004 08:40 PM

Paul, in fairness to me, nobody refuted my argument - you yourself practically admitt this by saying it was deemed off-topic.However, I am not ignorant of the points raised, and have been researching my premises and their factual basis. You raised good points but I haven't made my hypothesis complete yet. But the basics are in that thread, and I believe I atleast think you can grasp the premises, and what they mean if you read carefully.When my knowledge is complete I will make a thread called Hypothesis of consciousness. I am aware that syllogisms are not very fruitful - which is why I endeavour to fully explain my premises and make falsifiables aswell as verifiables. This message has been edited by AdminPhat, 12-08-2004 12:08 AM

I think it doesn't matter if my argument was sound. Atheists desire to refute it even if it doesn't have holes. So, yes - I'm not trying to box God, but I was responding to a challenge that says no logical support of theism is possible. Which is nonsense IMHO.If the atheist chooses to gnore the complete prophetic bible of truth, and all the prophecies of the bible we have proved on this forum then that's up to them. I even suggested extra-biblical sources to Dan and he denied the truth of Christ.

Also - concerning my Hypothesis of consciousness - I notice that it comes back to trying to show how mike is wrong logically, when no refutation can be had. I suggest you read it, it's amusing. "mike - your argument's logically correct"......*disgruntlement*......."mike, your argument's illogical"........*disgruntlemen*...."mike - your argument is logical"........*takes things personally*..."mike - your argument is illogical".