quote:
Originally posted by halcyonwaters:
quote:
I am not misreading. I am pointing out that your logic is flawed.
You said I said the following three things:
#1 Verses in the Bible support ES
#2 Verses in the Bible contradict #1
#3 No verses in the Bible contradict
Obviously those three statements contradict each other, but I never said #2. So yes, you are definitely misreading.
OK.
Back in post #96 you stated:
quote:
All verses fit with Eternal Security. Many verses do not fit with maintaining or losing salvation.
I responded with:
[quote]
Many verses do not fit with maintaining one's salvation. This implies that some verses DO NOT FIT, but are nonetheless present?[/b][/quote]
To which I got no denial, so I assumed that the statement was acceptable. Hence, a contradiction. So the fair question becomes, are there any verses which support an alternate interpretation?
quote:
Pay attention to word choice. If you're going to say the Bible has overwhelming evidence of extensive editing: Define your Terms and show Evidence; not generalizations. "We have notes in some cases," is very obscure and could mean anything.
You are right. I have been working long hours and have not been citing sources as I should.
A very interesting source concerning the KJV is this:
Tegart.com is available at DomainMarket.com. Call 888-694-6735
You'll note such things as "Many times, the KJV-translators translated from the 'qere' (the marginal note in the Masoretic text) rather than the 'ketic' (the actual text itself).
Also note that the site is a Christian site, the author arguing not that the Bible is false but that it has been sloppily translated.
Another one concerning the KJV:
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.bible.ca/b-kjv-only.htm
Or this on the Masoretic text:
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/elohim.html
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com