The creationist "information argument"....

iF MUltiple mutations were added to our understanding then the genome this came from correlated to other stats in biology would be interesting and would indeed make the point but this is I think a point with ICR AIG when they say reiterating that mutations do not add information for in the content of the context of our taught evolutionary theory all we have gotten professionally (as long as my know"" is in the loop)is DEVELOPEMENTAL contraints but to falsifiy this claim one would need to know what LAWS ordinal POSITIONS of genes mutations (mutated genes)apply in heritbility, the environment, and development even if some generalized algebraic invariace may be common to any participating artithemiatic for every mechanics involved and all geometry. But that is more that evolutionists have so they do prefer philosophically sometimes to discuss species selection instead rather than disceting whatever kinematics this may influence in the granting cycle. There is some room here for biochemical discussion as well but I pass. Just look at how hope ful the monstor of the Burgess Shale could be with 11 digits per fin. Not easy when the uniqueness has nothing to compare to. Evolution could still be but the inference would be lacking or at best a throw back to less enlightened days for some on this board.