Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Endosymbiont theory wrong?
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 6 of 43 (17132)
09-10-2002 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Itzpapalotl
09-09-2002 12:53 PM


Itzpapalotl,
Excellent post. Can I have permission to store those evidences you present ( with cites) in a word doc, so as I can shamelessly plagiarise you at a later date?
(I will of course credit you ),
Mark
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Itzpapalotl, posted 09-09-2002 12:53 PM Itzpapalotl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Itzpapalotl, posted 09-11-2002 7:12 AM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 11 of 43 (17193)
09-11-2002 6:21 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Itzpapalotl
09-11-2002 7:12 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Itzpapalotl:
mark24
feel free to plagiarise me although you should probably also credit: http://users.rcn.com/...et/BiologyPages/E/Endosymbiosis.html who i forgot to mention in my original post.
This page is critical of endosymbiosis although not from a creationist perspective: http://www.gwu.edu/...win/BiSc151/Eukaryotes/Eukaryotes.html
if anyone knows any other sites or articles that have criticisms of endosymbiosis i would be interested in reading them.

Itzpapalotl,
Thanks for the links.
Mark

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Itzpapalotl, posted 09-11-2002 7:12 AM Itzpapalotl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024