Questions Creationists Never Answer

Hi, John Paul!

---

John Paul writes to Schraf:
Well then wait. Or do some actual research into what it is you are debating against.

---

After reading message 3 from Schraf it appears that she read your reference and had some specific comments. Isn't there anything in message 3 you could respond to?--Percy

Hi, John Paul!

---

John Paul writes:
I'm stretched pretty thin here trying to answer every evolutionist post.

---

I understand. You might want to pace yourself. There's no time requirement.

---

Gee whiz Percy, but did schraf respond to this: (see my first post in this thread) "Also you can find info on AiG and other Creation websites. I don't know why evolutionists harp on this so much- can they tell us exactly what the first alleged population(s) of single-celled organisms were and exactly how they mutated to get to the diversity of life we observe today? No. Does it matter? No. It does not matter 1 iota to the functionality and maintenance of life to know what started it. If it did someone should respond to my thread on that topic."

---

I thought this question was rhetorical, since you followed it with your own answer, and so perhaps Schraf did, too. Schraf, can you answer John Paul's question?--Percy

It *would* be nice if Creationists would confine themselves to proposals acceptable to their own religious community.--Percy

About this being a Tyrannosaurus rex: I think it's been misinterpreted. I can see how they made the mistake, but clearly it's a hadrosaur. --Percy