Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hoyle's Mathmatics of Evolution
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 4 of 18 (178786)
01-19-2005 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by MisterOpus1
01-19-2005 12:24 PM


mathematics is a model of reality and not reality
let me start off by pointing out that whenever there has been a significant disagreement between math and reality, reality has won.
take the (legend?) story of the engineer that calculated that bees cannot fly.
this story is humorous to most people because it shows how 'stupid' those engineers are, because he is obviously mistaken.
what is usually determined is that an assumption was in error or some other mistake or ommission was made in the mathematical model or that what is being modeled is not accurate.
math can help you find solutions but they are not THE solutions.
One thing is clear, regardless of the calculations, evolution is occuring and has occured. The bee flies.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by MisterOpus1, posted 01-19-2005 12:24 PM MisterOpus1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by coffee_addict, posted 01-20-2005 2:12 AM RAZD has replied
 Message 6 by Dr Jack, posted 01-20-2005 4:34 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 8 of 18 (178854)
01-20-2005 7:35 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Dr Jack
01-20-2005 4:34 AM


Re: mathematics is a model of reality and not reality
I know, but everyone knows the urban legend version.
and notice how, either way, this shows that the model was not correct ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Dr Jack, posted 01-20-2005 4:34 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 9 of 18 (178855)
01-20-2005 7:38 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by coffee_addict
01-20-2005 2:12 AM


Re: mathematics is a model of reality and not reality
because there is no real "ideal gas" just some that come close, so it is an indicator of general trend of behavior but not an absolute model.
I think you find that in every mathematical model: it has to be an absolute answer for the math, but reality has to many little random elements to be that precise.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by coffee_addict, posted 01-20-2005 2:12 AM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by coffee_addict, posted 01-20-2005 11:55 AM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 13 of 18 (179163)
01-20-2005 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by MisterOpus1
01-20-2005 11:54 AM


macro vs micro ... in DNA
The answer to me has always been that Macro = (N)x(Micro) ... it is just a matter of degree. And the proof to me is in the genetics, where the differences in genes between phylum are the same kind of differences as those seen between species, only more of them.
There waw a thread on this a little while back that got some interesting information into it.
{{"Macro" vs "Micro" genetic "kind" mechanism?}}
http://EvC Forum: "Macro" vs "Micro" genetic "kind" mechanism?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by MisterOpus1, posted 01-20-2005 11:54 AM MisterOpus1 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024