Author
|
Topic: Is venus spinning backwards?
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 1 of 25 (1781)
01-09-2002 4:10 PM
|
|
|
Is venus spinning backwards?
Replies to this message: | | Message 3 by mark24, posted 01-09-2002 8:30 PM | | redstang281 has replied | | Message 4 by Percy, posted 01-10-2002 10:01 AM | | redstang281 has replied |
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 5 of 25 (1830)
01-10-2002 1:25 PM
|
Reply to: Message 4 by Percy 01-10-2002 10:01 AM
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Percipient: Hi, Redstang! Welcome back! I hope you had a great holiday! I'm sorry I took so long to reply, but I finally posted an answer to you at the Is the Bible the Word of God thread. If you're still interested take a look. --Percy
It became difficult to answer the volume of posts I was receiving. I'll try to get to that post.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 4 by Percy, posted 01-10-2002 10:01 AM | | Percy has not replied |
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 6 of 25 (1831)
01-10-2002 1:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 3 by mark24 01-09-2002 8:30 PM
|
|
quote: Originally posted by mark24: & no, everything forming from a coalescing, spinning system DOESN'T have to spin the same way.
why?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 3 by mark24, posted 01-09-2002 8:30 PM | | mark24 has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 7 by joz, posted 01-10-2002 4:16 PM | | redstang281 has not replied | | Message 10 by mark24, posted 01-10-2002 5:21 PM | | redstang281 has not replied |
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 12 of 25 (1908)
01-11-2002 12:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 11 by Percy 01-10-2002 9:49 PM
|
|
What's the current theory of the formation of the universe?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 11 by Percy, posted 01-10-2002 9:49 PM | | Percy has not replied |
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
[b] [QUOTE]
I know exactly what you mean! Posts totally pile up on me, I don't know what it is, mabye its cause I cause alot of riots in these forums, hehe, mabye its just cause I like a good discussion, or mabye Im just a good debater Hehe whatever it is I know it. [/b][/QUOTE] Yes sir, we are the dreaded creationists. It's fun to team up on us
This message is a reply to: | | Message 8 by TrueCreation, posted 01-10-2002 4:43 PM | | TrueCreation has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 14 by joz, posted 01-11-2002 1:01 PM | | redstang281 has replied |
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 15 of 25 (1915)
01-11-2002 1:46 PM
|
Reply to: Message 14 by joz 01-11-2002 1:01 PM
|
|
quote: Originally posted by joz: Umm given that you seem to be often in a minority as a virtue of your own beliefs, it seems slightly odd to complain that the ratio isn`t 1:1. the mathmatics of it is quite simple, for example, given a population of 20 posters, 5 of which form one ideological group and the remainder another, if all posters post at the same rate then there will be more posts from one group than the other... We are`nt ganging up on you there are just more of us...
I'm allowed to joke once in a while, right?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 14 by joz, posted 01-11-2002 1:01 PM | | joz has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 16 by Percy, posted 01-11-2002 1:55 PM | | redstang281 has not replied |
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
quote: Originally posted by TrueCreation: "It became difficult to answer the volume of posts I was receiving. I'll try to get to that post. " --I know exactly what you mean! Posts totally pile up on me, I don't know what it is, mabye its cause I cause alot of riots in these forums, hehe, mabye its just cause I like a good discussion, or mabye Im just a good debater Hehe whatever it is I know it.
It's definatly the ratio thing. Probably also helps with your debate skills, although I don't think I can lay claim to that one. BTW, are you a YEC creationist? Back to the topic. Can any evolutionist bring the theory of the universes origins to the table for me?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 17 by TrueCreation, posted 01-11-2002 11:25 PM | | TrueCreation has not replied |
|
redstang281
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 23 of 25 (2080)
01-14-2002 12:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 19 by gene90 01-12-2002 1:27 PM
|
|
[QUOTE][b] Current theory of the origin of the universe is that there was a large expansion ~15 bya (with a large variation in different age estimates) and that material from that expansion coalesced into stellar systems, the Earth is probably in the third or fourth generation of stellar systems.
[/QUOTE] [/b] Why do you say that it is probably in the third or fourth generation?
[b] [QUOTE]
In prior (failed) attempts to post in this thread I debunked the Creationist use of Venus' retrograde orbit, but I'll just give redstang a change to state his position first. [/b][/QUOTE] I'm not really expecting to gain any ground on this one. Whenever scientist encounter and obsticle all it requires is another imaginative theory. [This message has been edited by redstang281, 01-14-2002]
This message is a reply to: | | Message 19 by gene90, posted 01-12-2002 1:27 PM | | gene90 has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 24 by joz, posted 01-14-2002 1:29 PM | | redstang281 has not replied |
|