Science rejects Abiogenesis

To the author of this topic,Yep, not a good thing. When I started, I made the same dumb mistake. Give credit for the sources so we can check these. Becuase, how do we know you are not just saying things to agree with what you think? How do we know if you are or are not manipulating science to fit your own definitions?Until sources are cited, I will assume the two beginning posts are false, for there is not way that we can back them up or validate them. And it there is not way, then you are to discard them.Need sources. Not a good practice not quoting sources.------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

SPLx,Thanks for posting your posts. I do not like plagarism and do not like words being passed off as the author of this topic's own words.You are right, does not allow posts to be looked at in a very good light. Hey any more sources about abiogensis? Would appreciate them, am doing reserach over it. Thanks.------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

Nice convienent save. But as for the dates the web sites were posted and the day your message was posted, not credible. The similarities in almost word for word and also content for content is too coincidental. Mathematically possible? Sure, but not likely. Still does not get you off the hook buddy.Keep squirming, you just might be able to work yourself off the hook if no one is looking.------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

minnemooseus,Is there any evidence that different laws might have been in effect in these time periods we are talking that would allow for spontaneous generation. Obviously the laws had to be different?I need this for research, some creationists were quoting that the physical laws were always the same. Laws of thermodynamics.What is your take on this question, and to the others any help from either side would be great.Waiting for your reply.Besides good post.------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day[This message has been edited by acmhttu001_2006, 10-01-2002]

minnemooseus,I was up late last night, not used to being up that late. Do not know what I was typing until I reread my message tonight, and then I saw you had replied to it. Before scrolling down, I think to myself, oh boy, this ought to be good. And sure enough I was not disappointed.I am so sorry, I was very tired. The message has been re-edited. Out of all the posts that have really made me laugh, this has to be the one.The spirit of Brad, oh heck no. Just wanted to see what "scientific" things the other side had to offer. I am getting frustrated, as they cannot directly answer some of my questions nor other questions that are raised by others.Anyways, thanks for posting. I knew you had fun with this one. And I am sure that we all needed a good laugh.------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

Thanks,And yes I did go and check out the source. Have some to think about it, before discussing this with you.------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day