Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   My Understanding (hypothetically)
derwood
Member (Idle past 1876 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 11 of 69 (186774)
02-19-2005 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Rand Al'Thor
02-18-2005 10:31 PM


Translation?
Here's about the most concise one I can manage:
I am a lunatic. I don't take my medicine. I think angular momentum has something to do with DNA. I think baraminology is scientific. I think girls are scary. Please help me. I am needy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 02-18-2005 10:31 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Brad McFall, posted 02-19-2005 1:55 PM derwood has replied

  
derwood
Member (Idle past 1876 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 13 of 69 (187015)
02-20-2005 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Brad McFall
02-19-2005 1:55 PM


You've reproduced????
quote:
You would have been better off without the last three sentences.
I see, so these are OK:
quote:
I am a lunatic. I don't take my medicine. I think angular momentum has something to do with DNA. I think baraminology is scientific
quote:
I will start by saying that it is trivial to associate the genetic number of Mendel to the total set of natural numbers.
What is the "genetic number of Mendel"?
quote:
I will use the equivocalness of Mendel’s use of words parent and hybrid to EXIST in this set (by definition) and I find the baramin (that kind which can only exist to itself) to BE Mendel’s developmental binomial as van de Waerden decomposition of the natural numbers in to a finite number of classes as divided by the subsets of natural numbers on finding the granted arbitrarily long arithemetic progression. In other words what makes it necessary that kinds can only reproduce AFteR their kind is a result of the causality of the aribitrarily long arithemetic progression on the other number of finite subsets of the classed total list of natural numbers.
Ah, well, why did n't you say that before? That makes perfect sense now!
quote:
That is what is missing from current evoltutionary theory and one can read in the literature evolutionists not appreciating the the difference made in the creationist literature as to whether the after referred to God or the Kinds.
Silly evolutionists...
quote:
A famous theoremof van der Waerden (Nieuw Arch. F. Wisk. 15 (1927) 212-6) asserts that, if the natural numbers are subdivided into a finite number of classes ( in any manner whatsoever), at least one of these classes contains arbitrarily long arithemetic progressions. This result suggests many other interesting questions, most of which have only been partially answered. In SEQUENCES VOL I 1966 by Halberstam and Roth: Oxford at the Clarendon Press
And numbers pertain to biological entities how exactly? Does their angular momentum diffuse their quantum positive shift in space-time? Or does the weak nuclear force perturb their superegos substantively such that their force vector of deceleration is supplanted by the quark-Jipsom supernumerary theory of red-shifting pathos and the english language derivative thereof?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Brad McFall, posted 02-19-2005 1:55 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by AdminJar, posted 02-20-2005 3:09 PM derwood has not replied
 Message 16 by Brian, posted 02-20-2005 3:28 PM derwood has replied
 Message 17 by Brad McFall, posted 02-20-2005 3:42 PM derwood has not replied
 Message 18 by Snikwad, posted 02-20-2005 11:31 PM derwood has not replied

  
derwood
Member (Idle past 1876 days)
Posts: 1457
Joined: 12-27-2001


Message 46 of 69 (187543)
02-22-2005 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Brian
02-20-2005 3:28 PM


Re: You've reproduced????
Hey Brian - how DID you get that picture of your dad?
Oh, and gee, I'm real sorry Brad to point out the incomprehensibility and irrelevance of your posts.
This message has been edited by SLPx, 02-22-2005 16:07 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Brian, posted 02-20-2005 3:28 PM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by AdminJar, posted 02-22-2005 4:09 PM derwood has not replied
 Message 50 by Brad McFall, posted 02-23-2005 8:40 AM derwood has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024