quote:
I think that Science and the scietific method are both part of the Positivist Philosophy, and there fore trying to PROVE!
There is no 100% proven thing in science, and never has been.
quote:
C-Frog and R-Hector both talk about EVIDENCE. evidence leads to proof and there fore DOES PROVE, Science Proves.
No, evidence leads to
confidence and reliability, not absolute, 100% proof. No matter how well-supported a theory is and no matter how confident we are in it's reliability, it could still be wrong, and must be amenable to falsification.
quote:
C-Frog: I don't think that God and Evolution are incompatable (in fact, most catholics i know think that God created the world through evolution). it is unacceptable for me because of faith.
Fine, as long as you stay out of the science classroom or legislation based upon your faith, I have no problem.
quote:
if something can be proven no faith is needed, if you ever need faith in science, because it is not proving anything it is junk science (like phrenology). if you can't prove it, by repeatable observation it shouldn't be science.
Repeatable observations, yes, and also accurate predictions and retrodictions.
The ToE has been tested more than just about any theory, and has survived all tests quite well. The mechanismaof Evolution are contested, but the existence of the event is undeniable, like the undeniability of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom combine to make water. It has been that reliable and that well supported, and that many of it's predictions and retrodictions have been borne out.
quote:
look i think that creationism is the least likely scenario, but if i am true to my scientific roots, TOE is more likely, but until proven, still wrong.
As I said above, nothing in science is ever proven, just supported to a greater or lesser degree.
quote:
FAITH, has no place in SCIENCE!
Agreed.