|
QuickSearch
Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] |
EvC Forum active members: 68 (9078 total) |
| |
harveyspecter | |
Total: 895,011 Year: 6,123/6,534 Month: 316/650 Week: 86/278 Day: 8/26 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What is the Meaning of John 3:16? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Can we all agree that John 3:16 is often quoted and that, like the proverbial Burma Shave signs, is ubiquitous?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Okay. You'll have to be somewhat patient with me. I was at a party and John sent Bill to go buy beer for everyone that liked him. It was a long, long evening.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
LOL
Afterall, if given a choice it's always better to be the scapegoat anyway. LOL Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
All of that is outside this topic. Here all we're trying to do is figure out what John 3 (and some other day we'll try get to the possible relevance of John itself). We're starting with John 3:16 since I believe it is so totally and consistently misunderstood, misused and misapplied. I gave one hint in Message 7 that may help explain what I believe is one of the biggest problems.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
First, John 3:16 always gets quoted out of context. I hope to work towards looking at the line in context but first it might be worthwhile to try to decide exactly what the line itself says.
John sent Bill to buy beer for everyone that liked him. John sent Bill to buy beer for everyone that liked John. John sent Bill to buy beer for everyone that liked Bill. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
What I imagine you'll find in near unanimity of current usage and no one asking the question.
But please remember this is only the first step, bringing up the question. I don't believe it can be resolved until we move on to look at John 3:16 within context. And I also believe that must be done in an orderly, step my step method or we will end up running in circles. For those reasons, I'm not looking to resolve the question right now, only to establish that there are at least two ways the single line can be interpreted when seen isolated, out of context. Unless we can get that established I see little hope of progress. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
That's okay, but we're still looking at John 3. I want to try to keep this as narrowly focused as possible, at least in the beginning.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Very good points and your observation of John 3:18 will become particularly important as we move along.
John 3 is pretty short and we'll be returning again and again to it so here it is in its entirety.
I would like to ask all of you to look closely at John 3:15-18in relation to what comes before. Are there any difference in construction between those four lines and what leads up to them? It seems to me that John 3:1-14 is a pretty straight forward recitation of Jesus teachings. He's speaking to Nicodemus, one of the Pharisees. Nic had some questions and as Jesus often did, he answers Nic's questions with a series of examples. In the conversation Jeus is clearly talking about man's relationship with GOD. The passage ends logically at the end of line 14. Then the whole construction changes, the speaker changes, and we move from a discussion between Jesus and Nicodemus to an outside commentator. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Could be. Let's see where John 3 leads us?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
As I read John 3 there is no transition in John 3:12-13. Up until line 14 Jesus is still speaking to Nicodemus about man's relationship with GOD.
There is nothing before line 15 related to belief in Jesus. Would it help to step through John 3 from the beginning? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Let me ask you a question, if you please. Jesus is speaking beginning in line 5 through 14. Is that correct?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Okay, so in at least 5-14 we find Jesus speaking in the first person. In John 3:5 he says, "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, ..." and in John 3:12 he is still speaking in the first person, "If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?" So first person seems like a reasonable assumption. Now if you are speaking in first person and say "Do you believe in him?" are you referring to yourself or to someone else? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Okay. I believe that would be a reasonable interpretation.
So, if John 3:15 is a continuation of line 14 and Jesus is speaking in the first person, does the word "him" in John 3:15 refer to Jesus or someone else? If it is still in first person, why wouldn't Jesus say "... believe in me ..." instead of "... believe in him ...? If we are suddenly switching modes, then is John 3:15 actually a continuation, or is it, as I believe I can show, a later inserted redaction? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Great question and one that will help, I believe, in looking at John 3. The Term "Son of man" is pretty common in the Bible showing up in Numbers and Job, Psalms and Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekial as well as other places. In each instance it refers not to a divine person but to Joe ordinary. It's only in Daniel that any other interpretation of the term is given. There, at Belshazzar's feast when Daniel is doing some legerdemain for the King the term is given a meaning beyond the ordinary. In the earlier portions of John 3 Jesus uses references to the OT several times. He's also talking about individual salvation, so within that context is seems that when Jesus uses Son of man he's using it in the most prosaic sense. He's saying you can't get lifted up on your own. Somebody else has to do the lifting. And that's GOD. As we move further through John 3 I think there are several other indications that that is the correct interpretation. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 33957 From: Texas!! Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
Nope. At that point I think, if we assume a continuation of the conversation, that Jesus is using Son of man to mean just plain folk.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022