Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Deposition and Erosion of Sediments
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6044 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 8 of 127 (191965)
03-16-2005 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Faith
03-16-2005 4:37 PM


no sedimentary rock?
I am saying there is NO EVIDENCE OF EROSION on a single layer, which would certainly have obliterated it in its sedimentary form if it had been built up on DRY land over 20 million years. If you can't follow the argument get off the topic.
Hi Faith; it seems you are stating...
"Sedimentary rock cannot form. It would be obliterated by erosion faster than its formation."
If this is not accurate perhaps you can clarify your quote above.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Faith, posted 03-16-2005 4:37 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by NosyNed, posted 03-16-2005 5:03 PM pink sasquatch has not replied
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 03-19-2005 9:33 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6044 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 15 of 127 (191978)
03-16-2005 5:35 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Faith
03-16-2005 5:06 PM


layer diagram
It is getting wearisome simply trying to get across what I'm talking about. Again, it would be nice if a forum allowed drawing pictures to illustrate.
You can post pictures here.
Hopefully this will be helpful to the discussion:
Faith - I guess I'm having trouble understanding-
Are you proposing an alternative mechanism for the formation of the a single layer? If so, why is your mechanism more reasonable than what you are arguing against?
Such minuscule observations of the strata are not required for the obvious effects real erosion would have caused during a period of twenty million years or so.
The effects of real erosion produced the canyon, which I guess is pretty obvious (even though I hate that word). What you haven't addressed is why we would should expect the erosion rate to be the same a hundred yards into the wall of the canyon as it is at the site of the river itself.
I think you really need to address a seemingly key issue with your argument - that, as Nosy mentions above, NET sedimentation is the issue, and produced the results we see. In other words, as long as the sedimentation rate is greater than the erosion rate, sedimentation will occur.
You seem to be arguing that erosion would vastly exceed sedimentation across the entire landscape, not unlike it did in the formation of the canyon itself due to the erosive forces produced by the river. Do you have any evidence for a higher rate of erosion than sedimentation?
If not, your argument seems to have little basis.
This message has been edited by Admin, 03-17-2005 09:23 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Faith, posted 03-16-2005 5:06 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Faith, posted 03-19-2005 10:59 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024