Now I have heard just about everything...
The clown prince of creationist egomania got called out with his britches down and engaged in one of theshallowest, weaselly maneuvers I have seen from a creationist in a long time.
On T.O., after a post from James Acker (quoting me
) regardign Haldane's dilemma and ReMines lack of citations for papers providing 'solutions' to it, ReMine writes:
"I said MY READERS would be bored by the needless repetition in dissecting all the papers on Haldane's Dilemma. My book
covers the dilemma's concepts and arguments, not 'who said what when'. "
This seems a bit odd for the guy who earlier wrote(and ad nauseum has written):
"I said Haldane's Dilemma was not solved. Instead it was confused, garbled, and prematurely brushed aside."
Hmmm... So can something be "prematurely brushed aside" when, in fact, there were lots of papers on the matter in the literature, AND ReMine simply decided not to cite them. He says that he did not want to 'bore' his poor scientifically illiterate readers. Yet he provides 14 citations in support of a simple explanation of Haldane's model!
Is it just me, or is the stench of deception arising from the clown prince?
http://groups.google.com/...
{Shortened display form of URL, to restore page width to normal. - AM}
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 02-26-2005 00:21 AM